Public Order Bill — Report (2nd Day) — Amendment 56 — 7 Feb 2023 at 18:15

Moved by Lord Anderson of Ipswich

56: Clause 19, page 22, line 20, leave out sub-paragraphs (iii) to (v)Member's explanatory statementThis amendment would limit the trigger events for an SDPO to the commission of a protest-related offence and the breach of a protest-related injunction.

Ayes 259, Noes 200.

Debate in Parliament |

Public Whip is run as a free not-for-profit service. If you'd like to support us, please consider switching your (UK) electricity and/or gas to Octopus Energy or tip us via Ko-Fi.

Party Summary

Votes by party, red entries are votes against the majority for that party.

What is Tell? '+1 tell' means that in addition one member of that party was a teller for that division lobby.

What is Turnout? This is measured against the total membership of the party at the time of the vote.

PartyMajority (Content)Minority (Not-Content)Turnout
Bishop5 020.0%
Con2 186 (+2 tell)68.8%
Crossbench46 126.4%
DUP0 583.3%
Green2 0100.0%
Independent Labour1 0100.0%
Judge4 036.4%
Lab120 (+2 tell) 067.4%
LDem66 079.5%
Non-affiliated10 425.0%
PC1 0100.0%
UUP0 2100.0%
Total:257 19855.8%

Rebel Voters - sorted by party

Lords for which their vote in this division differed from the majority vote of their party. You can see all votes in this division, or every eligible lord who could have voted in this division

Sort by: Name | Party | Vote

Lord Garnier Con (front bench)aye
Viscount Hailsham Conaye
Lord Bew Crossbenchno
Baroness Foster of AghadrumseeNon-affiliatedno
Lord Fowler Non-affiliatedno
Baroness Stowell of BeestonNon-affiliated (front bench)no
Lord Tyrie Non-affiliated (front bench)no

About the Project

The Public Whip is a not-for-profit, open source website created in 2003 by Francis Irving and Julian Todd and now run by Bairwell Ltd.

The Whip on the Web

Help keep PublicWhip alive