Retained EU Law (Revocation and Reform) Bill — Report (1st Day) — Amendment 2 (to Amendment 1) — 15 May 2023 at 16:45

Moved by Lord Hope of Craighead

2: At end, insert-“(1B) Subsection (1) will only take effect if-(a) the legislation listed in Schedule (Sunset of subordinate legislation and retained direct EU legislation) has been referred to a Joint Committee of both Houses, and(b) a period of at least 30 days has elapsed after that referral, not including any period during which Parliament is dissolved or prorogued or either House is adjourned for more than four days.(1C) If the Joint Committee, after considering any legislation included in this Schedule, finds that the revocation of any item of legislation represents a substantial change to current UK law, a Minister of the Crown must arrange for the revocation of such legislation to be debated on the floor of each House and voted on before the date in subsection (1).(1D) If the revocation of any legislation is not approved by both Houses before the date in subsection (1), it is retained.”Member's explanatory statementThis amendment to the amendment in the name of Lord Callanan provides for the Schedule of retained EU law which is to be revoked to be referred to a Joint Committee of both Houses for sifting so that, in the case of those which represent a significant change from the preceding retained EU law, Parliament will be enabled to differ from the Executive and express its own view as to their contents.

Ayes 245, Noes 154.

Debate in Parliament |

Public Whip is run as a free not-for-profit service. If you'd like to support us, please consider switching your (UK) electricity and/or gas to Octopus Energy or tip us via Ko-Fi.

Party Summary

Votes by party, red entries are votes against the majority for that party.

What is Tell? '+1 tell' means that in addition one member of that party was a teller for that division lobby.

What is Turnout? This is measured against the total membership of the party at the time of the vote.

PartyMajority (Content)Minority (Not-Content)Turnout
Con16 145 (+2 tell)59.1%
Crossbench45 (+1 tell) 126.9%
Green2 0100.0%
Independent Labour1 0100.0%
Judge0 (+1 tell) 09.1%
Lab102 056.7%
LDem63 075.9%
Non-affiliated12 632.1%
PC1 0100.0%
UUP1 050.0%
Total:243 15250.7%

Rebel Voters - sorted by name

Lords for which their vote in this division differed from the majority vote of their party. You can see all votes in this division, or every eligible lord who could have voted in this division

Sort by: Name | Party | Vote

NamePartyVote
Baroness Altmann Conaye
Lord Arbuthnot of EdromCon (front bench)aye
Lord Bew Crossbenchno
Baroness Browning Con (front bench)aye
Lord Faulks Non-affiliatedno
Baroness Fox of BuckleyNon-affiliatedno
Lord Gadhia Non-affiliatedno
Lord Goodlad Con (front bench)aye
Viscount Hailsham Conaye
Lord Hamilton of EpsomCon (front bench)aye
Lord Hodgson of Astley AbbottsConaye
Lord Kirkhope of HarrogateCon (front bench)aye
Baroness McIntosh of PickeringCon (front bench)aye
Lord McLoughlin Con (front bench)aye
Lord Northbrook Conaye
Lord Norton of LouthConaye
Lord Patten of BarnesConaye
Lord Pearson of RannochNon-affiliatedno
Baroness Shackleton of BelgraviaCon (front bench)aye
Baroness Stowell of BeestonNon-affiliated (front bench)no
Lord Tugendhat Conaye
Lord Tyrie Non-affiliated (front bench)no
Lord Wasserman Conaye

About the Project

The Public Whip is a not-for-profit, open source website created in 2003 by Francis Irving and Julian Todd and now run by Bairwell Ltd.

The Whip on the Web

Help keep PublicWhip alive