Retained EU Law (Revocation and Reform) Bill — Report (1st Day) — Amendment 2 (to Amendment 1) — 15 May 2023 at 16:45
Moved by Lord Hope of Craighead
2: At end, insert-“(1B) Subsection (1) will only take effect if-(a) the legislation listed in Schedule (Sunset of subordinate legislation and retained direct EU legislation) has been referred to a Joint Committee of both Houses, and(b) a period of at least 30 days has elapsed after that referral, not including any period during which Parliament is dissolved or prorogued or either House is adjourned for more than four days.(1C) If the Joint Committee, after considering any legislation included in this Schedule, finds that the revocation of any item of legislation represents a substantial change to current UK law, a Minister of the Crown must arrange for the revocation of such legislation to be debated on the floor of each House and voted on before the date in subsection (1).(1D) If the revocation of any legislation is not approved by both Houses before the date in subsection (1), it is retained.”Member's explanatory statementThis amendment to the amendment in the name of Lord Callanan provides for the Schedule of retained EU law which is to be revoked to be referred to a Joint Committee of both Houses for sifting so that, in the case of those which represent a significant change from the preceding retained EU law, Parliament will be enabled to differ from the Executive and express its own view as to their contents.
Ayes 245, Noes 154.
Party Summary
Votes by party, red entries are votes against the majority for that party.
What is Tell? '+1 tell' means that in addition one member of that party was a teller for that division lobby.
What is Turnout? This is measured against the total membership of the party at the time of the vote.Party | Majority (Content) | Minority (Not-Content) | Turnout |
Con | 16 | 145 (+2 tell) | 59.1% |
Crossbench | 45 (+1 tell) | 1 | 26.9% |
Green | 2 | 0 | 100.0% |
Independent Labour | 1 | 0 | 100.0% |
Judge | 0 (+1 tell) | 0 | 9.1% |
Lab | 102 | 0 | 56.7% |
LDem | 63 | 0 | 75.9% |
Non-affiliated | 12 | 6 | 32.1% |
PC | 1 | 0 | 100.0% |
UUP | 1 | 0 | 50.0% |
Total: | 243 | 152 | 50.7% |
Rebel Voters - sorted by party
Lords for which their vote in this division differed from the majority vote of their party. You can see all votes in this division, or every eligible lord who could have voted in this division
Name | Party | Vote |
Baroness Altmann | Con | aye |
Lord Arbuthnot of Edrom | Con | aye |
Baroness Browning | Con (front bench) | aye |
Lord Goodlad | Con (front bench) | aye |
Viscount Hailsham | Con | aye |
Lord Hamilton of Epsom | Con (front bench) | aye |
Lord Hodgson of Astley Abbotts | Con | aye |
Lord Kirkhope of Harrogate | Con | aye |
Baroness McIntosh of Pickering | Con | aye |
Lord McLoughlin | Con (front bench) | aye |
Lord Northbrook | Con | aye |
Lord Norton of Louth | Con | aye |
Lord Patten of Barnes | Con | aye |
Baroness Shackleton of Belgravia | Con (front bench) | aye |
Lord Tugendhat | Con | aye |
Lord Wasserman | Con | aye |
Lord Bew | Crossbench | no |
Lord Faulks | Non-affiliated | no |
Baroness Fox of Buckley | Non-affiliated | no |
Lord Gadhia | Non-affiliated | no |
Lord Pearson of Rannoch | Non-affiliated | no |
Baroness Stowell of Beeston | Non-affiliated (front bench) | no |
Lord Tyrie | Non-affiliated (front bench) | no |