Illegal Migration Bill — Report (2nd Day) — Amendment 64 — 3 Jul 2023 at 16:15
Moved by Baroness Lister of Burtersett
64: Clause 10, page 17, line 30, leave out subsection (10)Member's explanatory statement This is a technical amendment that is consequent on the amendment in my name to Clause 10, page 17, line 32. This is because section 10(10) as currently in the Bill is consistent with the exclusion of pregnant women from section 60 protection, and should therefore be removed as a consequence of the other amendment.
Ayes 226, Noes 152.
Party Summary
Votes by party, red entries are votes against the majority for that party.
What is Tell? '+1 tell' means that in addition one member of that party was a teller for that division lobby.
What is Turnout? This is measured against the total membership of the party at the time of the vote.Party | Majority (Content) | Minority (Not-Content) | Turnout |
Bishop | 3 | 0 | 12.0% |
Con | 6 | 142 (+2 tell) | 54.0% |
Crossbench | 45 | 3 | 27.6% |
DUP | 2 | 0 | 33.3% |
Green | 2 | 0 | 100.0% |
Independent Labour | 1 | 0 | 100.0% |
Judge | 0 | 1 | 10.0% |
Lab | 98 (+2 tell) | 0 | 56.2% |
LDem | 58 | 0 | 68.2% |
Non-affiliated | 8 | 3 | 19.6% |
PC | 1 | 0 | 100.0% |
UUP | 0 | 1 | 50.0% |
Total: | 224 | 150 | 46.2% |
Rebel Voters - sorted by party
Lords for which their vote in this division differed from the majority vote of their party. You can see all votes in this division, or every eligible lord who could have voted in this division
Name | Party | Vote |
Lord Cormack | Con (front bench) | aye |
Baroness Fall | Con (front bench) | aye |
Baroness Helic | Con | aye |
Baroness Mobarik | Con (front bench) | aye |
Baroness Sugg | Con (front bench) | aye |
Baroness Wyld | Con (front bench) | aye |
Lord Bew | Crossbench | no |
Lord Greenway | Crossbench | no |
Lord Mawson | Crossbench (front bench) | no |
Lord Faulks | Non-affiliated | no |
Lord Gadhia | Non-affiliated | no |
Baroness Stowell of Beeston | Non-affiliated (front bench) | no |