Illegal Migration Bill — Report (2nd Day) — Amendment 64 — 3 Jul 2023 at 16:15
Moved by Baroness Lister of Burtersett
64: Clause 10, page 17, line 30, leave out subsection (10)Member's explanatory statement This is a technical amendment that is consequent on the amendment in my name to Clause 10, page 17, line 32. This is because section 10(10) as currently in the Bill is consistent with the exclusion of pregnant women from section 60 protection, and should therefore be removed as a consequence of the other amendment.
Ayes 226, Noes 152.
Public Whip is run as a free not-for-profit service. If you'd like to support us, please
consider switching your (UK) electricity and/or gas to Octopus Energy or tip us via Ko-Fi.
Party Summary
Votes by party, red entries are votes against the majority for that party.
What is Tell? '+1 tell' means that in addition one member of that party was a teller for that division lobby.
What is Turnout? This is measured against the total membership of the party at the time of the vote.| Party | Majority (Content) | Minority (Not-Content) | Turnout |
| Bishop | 3 | 0 | 12.0% |
| Con | 6 | 142 (+2 tell) | 54.0% |
| Crossbench | 45 | 3 | 27.6% |
| DUP | 2 | 0 | 33.3% |
| Green | 2 | 0 | 100.0% |
| Independent Labour | 1 | 0 | 100.0% |
| Judge | 0 | 1 | 10.0% |
| Lab | 98 (+2 tell) | 0 | 56.2% |
| LDem | 57 | 0 | 67.9% |
| Non-affiliated | 9 | 3 | 21.1% |
| PC | 1 | 0 | 100.0% |
| UUP | 0 | 1 | 50.0% |
| Total: | 224 | 150 | 46.2% |
All lords Eligible to Vote - sorted by party
Includes lords who were absent (or abstained) from this vote.