Terrorism (Protection of Premises) Bill — Report — Amendment 13 — 4 Mar 2025 at 18:15

Moved by Lord De Mauley

13: After Clause 5, insert the following new Clause-“Exemption from public protection procedures(1) The person responsible for qualifying premises or events may apply to the Secretary of State, or the Security Industry Authority, for exemption from one or all of the public protection procedures.(2) Exemption from the public protection procedures must be granted if the Secretary of State, or the Security Industry Authority, is satisfied that the applicant has demonstrated that the public protection procedures in question would not materially reduce the threat of terrorism or the risk of harm in the case of a terrorist attack.”Member’s explanatory statementThis amendment would oblige the Secretary of State or the Security Industry Authority to alleviate rules if the applicant can prove that the implementation of such procedures would not materially reduce the threat of terrorism or the risk of harm in the case of a terrorist attack.

Ayes 200, Noes 236.

Debate in Parliament |

Public Whip is run as a free not-for-profit service. If you'd like to support us, please consider switching your (UK) electricity and/or gas to Octopus Energy or tip us via Ko-Fi.

Party Summary

Votes by party, red entries are votes against the majority for that party.

What is Tell? '+1 tell' means that in addition one member of that party was a teller for that division lobby.

What is Turnout? This is measured against the total membership of the party at the time of the vote.

PartyMajority (Not-Content)Minority (Content)Turnout
Bishop1 04.0%
Con0 179 (+2 tell)60.9%
Crossbench20 313.5%
DUP0 583.3%
Green1 050.0%
Independent Labour1 0100.0%
Judge1 011.1%
Lab121 (+2 tell) 068.0%
LDem55 067.9%
Non-affiliated7 524.0%
PC1 050.0%
UUP0 266.7%
Total:208 19449.1%

Rebel Voters - sorted by party

Lords for which their vote in this division differed from the majority vote of their party. You can see all votes in this division, or every eligible lord who could have voted in this division

Sort by: Name | Party | Vote

NamePartyVote
The Earl of ErrollCrossbenchaye
Lord Greenway Crossbenchaye
Earl Peel Crossbenchaye
Baroness Fox of BuckleyNon-affiliatedaye
Baroness Hoey Non-affiliatedaye
Lord Inglewood Non-affiliatedaye
Lord Lupton Non-affiliatedaye
Baroness Stowell of BeestonNon-affiliated (front bench)aye

About the Project

The Public Whip is a not-for-profit, open source website created in 2003 by Francis Irving and Julian Todd and now run by Bairwell Ltd.

The Whip on the Web

Help keep PublicWhip alive