Terrorism (Protection of Premises) Bill — Report — Amendment 13 — 4 Mar 2025 at 18:15
Moved by Lord De Mauley
13: After Clause 5, insert the following new Clause-“Exemption from public protection procedures(1) The person responsible for qualifying premises or events may apply to the Secretary of State, or the Security Industry Authority, for exemption from one or all of the public protection procedures.(2) Exemption from the public protection procedures must be granted if the Secretary of State, or the Security Industry Authority, is satisfied that the applicant has demonstrated that the public protection procedures in question would not materially reduce the threat of terrorism or the risk of harm in the case of a terrorist attack.”Member’s explanatory statementThis amendment would oblige the Secretary of State or the Security Industry Authority to alleviate rules if the applicant can prove that the implementation of such procedures would not materially reduce the threat of terrorism or the risk of harm in the case of a terrorist attack.
Ayes 200, Noes 236.
Party Summary
Votes by party, red entries are votes against the majority for that party.
What is Tell? '+1 tell' means that in addition one member of that party was a teller for that division lobby.
What is Turnout? This is measured against the total membership of the party at the time of the vote.| Party | Majority (Not-Content) | Minority (Content) | Turnout |
| Bishop | 1 | 0 | 4.0% |
| Con | 0 | 179 (+2 tell) | 60.9% |
| Crossbench | 20 | 3 | 13.5% |
| DUP | 0 | 5 | 83.3% |
| Green | 1 | 0 | 50.0% |
| Independent Labour | 1 | 0 | 100.0% |
| Judge | 1 | 0 | 11.1% |
| Lab | 121 (+2 tell) | 0 | 68.0% |
| LDem | 55 | 0 | 67.9% |
| Non-affiliated | 7 | 5 | 24.0% |
| PC | 1 | 0 | 50.0% |
| UUP | 0 | 2 | 66.7% |
| Total: | 208 | 194 | 49.1% |
All lords Eligible to Vote - sorted by party
Includes lords who were absent (or abstained) from this vote.