Mental Health Bill [HL] — Report (1st Day) — Amendment 11 — 31 Mar 2025 at 18:00

Moved by Lord Scriven

11: Clause 6, page 12, line 40, at end insert-“(2A) In section 17B (conditions) after subsection (7) insert-“(8) The responsible clinician must ensure that community treatment orders align with the code of practice as set out in section 118(2B).(9) A community treatment order shall have a maximum duration of 12 months, subject to the following provisions- (a) the responsible clinician may extend the duration of a community treatment order beyond 12 months only after- (i) consulting the patient, the patient’s nominated persons, and any relevant mental health care professional involved in the patient’s treatment or care planning;(ii) undertaking a review process to evaluate the ongoing necessity and therapeutic benefit of the community treatment order;(iii) consulting a General Medical Council registered psychiatrist regarding the conditions of the community treatment order and obtaining their written agreement that an extension is necessary and in accordance with the principles set out in section 118(2B);(b) community treatment orders with a duration of less than 12 months are not subject to the review process set out in subsection (9)(a)(ii);(c) a tribunal may recommend that the responsible clinician consider whether to extend, vary, or terminate the duration and conditions of a community treatment order.(10) Where a community treatment order is extended beyond a period of 12 months, the order shall be subject to review at intervals not exceeding six months, in accordance with the procedure set out in subsection 9(a).(11) At the conclusion of the default period or any extended period, the responsible clinician must undertake a review to assess the effectiveness of the community treatment order in aligning with the code of practice stipulated in section 118(2B).””Member’s explanatory statementThis amendment ensures that community treatment orders align with the code of practice, limits their default duration to 12 months, requires a structured review process for extensions, mandates six-monthly reviews for extended orders, and reinforces patient consultation and oversight by mental health professionals.

Ayes 272, Noes 157.

Debate in Parliament |

Public Whip is run as a free not-for-profit service. If you'd like to support us, please consider switching your (UK) electricity and/or gas to Octopus Energy or tip us via Ko-Fi.

Party Summary

Votes by party, red entries are votes against the majority for that party.

What is Tell? '+1 tell' means that in addition one member of that party was a teller for that division lobby.

What is Turnout? This is measured against the total membership of the party at the time of the vote.

PartyMajority (Content)Minority (Not-Content)Turnout
Con178 059.9%
Crossbench20 816.5%
DUP4 066.7%
Green2 0100.0%
Independent Labour0 1100.0%
Judge1 011.1%
Lab0 116 (+1 tell)64.6%
LDem52 (+2 tell) 066.7%
Non-affiliated5 418.0%
PC1 050.0%
Total:263 12949.4%

Rebel Voters - sorted by party

Lords for which their vote in this division differed from the majority vote of their party. You can see all votes in this division, or every eligible lord who could have voted in this division

Sort by: Name | Party | Vote

NamePartyVote
Baroness Bull Crossbench (front bench)no
Lord Carlile of BerriewCrossbench (front bench)no
Lord Hannay of ChiswickCrossbench (front bench)no
Lord Hendy of Richmond HillCrossbench (front bench)no
Lord Janvrin Crossbenchno
Lord Jay of EwelmeCrossbench (front bench)no
Lord Mawson Crossbench (front bench)no
Baroness Morgan of DrefelinCrossbenchno
Lord Austin of DudleyNon-affiliatedno
Baroness Kennedy of CradleyNon-affiliated (front bench)no
The Earl of KinnoullNon-affiliated (front bench)no
Lord Young of Old WindsorNon-affiliated (front bench)no

About the Project

The Public Whip is a not-for-profit, open source website created in 2003 by Francis Irving and Julian Todd and now run by Bairwell Ltd.

The Whip on the Web

Help keep PublicWhip alive