voted ambiguously on the policy
by scoring 42.4% compared to the votes below
|House||Date||Subject||Lorely Burt||Policy vote|
|Commons||6 Sep 2010||Parliamentary Voting System and Constituencies Bill — Second Reading||Majority||Majority|
|Commons||6 Sep 2010||Parliamentary Voting System and Constituencies Bill (Money)||Majority||Majority|
|Commons||20 Oct 2010||Parliamentary Voting System and Constituencies Bill — Clause 8 — Review Welsh Parliamentry Constituancies With Respect to Further Devoloution||absent||minority|
|Commons||20 Oct 2010||Parliamentary Voting System and Constituencies Bill — Clause 9 — Number of MPs||absent||Majority (strong)|
|Commons||1 Nov 2010||Parliamentary Voting System and Constituencies Bill — Clause 11 — number and distribution of seats||Majority||Majority|
|Commons||29 Jan 2013||Electoral Registration and Administration Bill — New Clause on Review of Parliamentary Constituency Boundaries||Majority||minority (strong)|
|House||Date||Subject||Baroness Burt of Solihull||Policy vote|
|no votes listed|
The MP's votes count towards a weighted average where the most important votes get 50 points, less important votes get 10 points, and less important votes for which the MP was absent get 2 points. In important votes the MP gets awarded the full 50 points for voting the same as the policy, no points for voting against the policy, and 25 points for not voting. In less important votes, the MP gets 10 points for voting with the policy, no points for voting against, and 1 (out of 2) if absent.
Questions about this formula can be discussed on the forum.
|No of votes||Points||Out of|
|Most important votes (50 points)|
|MP voted with policy||0||0||0|
|MP voted against policy||1||0||50|
|Less important votes (10 points)|
|MP voted with policy||3||30||30|
|MP voted against policy||0||0||0|
|Less important absentees (2 points)|
*Pressure of other work means MPs or Lords are not always available to vote – it does not always indicate they have abstained. Therefore, being absent on a less important vote makes a disproportionatly small difference.