Care Bill — New Clause 9 — Require Annual Report on Social Care Funding Levels — 10 Mar 2014 at 19:00
The majority of MPs voted not to require an annual report on the sufficiency of social care funding.
MPs were considering the Care Bill[1]. The proposed new clause rejected in this vote was:
- (1) The Joint Care and Support Reform Programme Board must inform the Secretary of State by an annual written report that it is satisfied whether sufficient funding is in place to ensure that social care is adequately funded and that the provisions in the Act can be implemented satisfactorily.
- (2) In subsection (1), the “Joint Care and Support Reform Programme Board” means the board of that name consisting of representatives of (but not limited to): the Local Government Association, the Association of Directors of Adult Social Services and the Department of Health.
- (3) The report mentioned in subsection (1) should include a statement of the satisfaction of the Joint Care and Support Reform Programme Board with (but not limited to)—
- (a) adequacy of the funding of the provisions in this Act,
- (b) on-going costs of implementation,
- (c) an additional five yearly review of the short and medium term cost of setting the eligibility criteria at the level set out in regulations.
==
Public Whip is run as a free not-for-profit service. If you'd like to support us, please
consider switching your (UK) electricity and/or gas to Octopus Energy or tip us via Ko-Fi.
All Votes Cast - sorted by constituency
MPs for which their vote in this division differed from the majority vote of their party are marked in red. Also shows which MPs were ministers at the time of this vote. You can also see every eligible MP including those who did not vote in this division.
Sort by: Name | Constituency | Party | Vote