Prevention of Terrorism Bill — Insisted Amendment — Courts and Conrol Orders — 10 Mar 2005 at 26:15
To anyone who wishes to complain about the quality of my decoding of these motions, may I refer you to this statement at the head of the debate.
The Aye-voters reaffirmed their vote earlier in Division 131, which reaffirmed their vote the day before in Division 122, and took out the changes made to the Prevention of Terrorism Bill by the House of Lords to make is so that a court would issue all control orders, rather than the secretary of state.
Party Summary
Votes by party, red entries are votes against the majority for that party.
What is Tell? '+1 tell' means that in addition one member of that party was a teller for that division lobby.
What are Boths? An MP can vote both aye and no in the same division. The boths page explains this.
What is Turnout? This is measured against the total membership of the party at the time of the vote.
| Party | Majority (Aye) | Minority (No) | Both | Turnout |
| Con | 0 | 138 (+1 tell) | 0 | 86.3% |
| Lab | 298 (+2 tell) | 24 | 0 | 79.4% |
| LDem | 0 | 51 (+1 tell) | 0 | 94.5% |
| SNP | 0 | 2 | 0 | 40.0% |
| UUP | 0 | 1 | 0 | 20.0% |
| Total: | 298 | 216 | 0 | 81.7% |
Rebel Voters - sorted by party
MPs for which their vote in this division differed from the majority vote of their party. You can see all votes in this division, or every eligible MP who could have voted in this division
Sort by: Name | Constituency | Party | Vote