Leaving the Eu: Business of the House — 12 Jun 2019 at 16:25

“one of the most fundamental shifts in the relationship between the government and parliament.”
“the restrictions on the Prime Minister’s powers...may cause a no-deal exit”-[Official Report, House of Lords, 8 April 2019; Vol. 797, c. 405.]
“We have been driven to this only in an extreme emergency”.-[Official Report, 27 March 2019; Vol. 657, c. 342.]
“If we as a House are going to be asked to hand over day after day, we should know what we will be asked to vote on during those days.”-[Official Report, 1 April 2019; Vol. 657, c. 809.]
“For the automotive sector, no deal is simply not an option. Hearing politicians promote a no deal does not fill any of our companies with confidence nor does it fill international investors with confidence. Our strong desire is that no deal be taken off the table.”
“Our members are quite blunt, they say that a no deal scenario would be nothing short of an act of economic vandalism”.
“No deal is something our members are most unanimous about. 45 % say no deal would lead to redundancies.”
“No Deal would be disastrous for some sectors…It is frankly worrying that that we see it being put forward as a plausible scenario to leave without a deal in October.”

Debate in Parliament |

Public Whip is run as a free not-for-profit free service. If you'd like to support us, please consider switching your electricity and/or gas to Bulb Energy who provide 100% renewable electricity and tend to be 20% cheaper than the 'Big Six'. They'll also pay any exit fees (up to £120) from your old supplier AND give you (and us) a £50 credit for joining up via our Bulb Referral Link.

Party Summary

Votes by party, red entries are votes against the majority for that party.

What is Tell? '+1 tell' means that in addition one member of that party was a teller for that division lobby.

What are Boths? An MP can vote both aye and no in the same division. The boths page explains this.

What is Turnout? This is measured against the total membership of the party at the time of the vote.

PartyMajority (No)Minority (Aye)BothTurnout
Con289 (+2 tell) 10096.2%
DUP10 00100.0%
Green0 10100.0%
Independent2 14080.0%
Lab8 223 (+2 tell)094.0%
LDem0 110100.0%
PC0 40100.0%
SNP0 350100.0%
Total:309 298095.2%

Rebel Voters - sorted by party

MPs for which their vote in this division differed from the majority vote of their party. You can see all votes in this division, or every eligible MP who could have voted in this division

Sort by: Name | Constituency | Party | Vote

Guto BebbAberconwyCon (front bench)aye
Kenneth ClarkeRushcliffeCon (front bench)aye
Jonathan DjanoglyHuntingdonCon (front bench)aye
Justine GreeningPutneyConaye
Dominic GrieveBeaconsfieldCon (front bench)aye
Sam GyimahEast SurreyCon (front bench)aye
Phillip LeeBracknellConaye
Oliver LetwinWest DorsetConaye
Antoinette SandbachEddisburyCon (front bench)aye
Caroline SpelmanMeridenCon (front bench)aye
Kevin BarronRother ValleyLab (minister)no
Ronnie CampbellBlyth ValleyLabno
Jim FitzpatrickPoplar and LimehouseLabno
Caroline FlintDon ValleyLab (minister)no
Stephen HepburnJarrowLab (minister)no
Kate HoeyVauxhallLab (minister)no
John MannBassetlawLab (minister)no
Graham StringerBlackley and BroughtonLab (minister)no

About the Project

The Public Whip is a not-for-profit, open source website created in 2003 by Francis Irving and Julian Todd and now run by Bairwell Ltd.

PublicWhip v2 codebase is currently under development - you can join the Slack group to find out more or email [email protected]

The Whip on the Web

Help keep PublicWhip alive