Telecommunications Infrastructure (Leasehold Property) Bill — Report — Amendment 1 — 29 Jun 2020 at 16:30
Moved by Lord Clement-Jones (LD)
1: Clause 1, page 1, line 11, after “premises” insert “(which include premises where a tenant is in exclusive possession)”Member’s explanatory statementThis amendment would clarify that tenanted premises are included under the provisions of this bill.
Ayes 294, Noes 234.
Votes by party, red entries are votes against the majority for that party.
What is Tell? '+1 tell' means that in addition one member of that party was a teller for that division lobby.What is Turnout? This is measured against the total membership of the party at the time of the vote.
|Party||Majority (Content)||Minority (Not-Content)||Turnout|
|Lord Naseby||Con (front bench)||aye|
|Lord Bichard||Crossbench (front bench)||no|
|Baroness Butler-Sloss||Crossbench (front bench)||no|
|Lord Butler of Brockwell||Crossbench (front bench)||no|
|Lord Cameron of Dillington||Crossbench (front bench)||no|
|Lord Carey of Clifton||Crossbench||no|
|Baroness Cavendish of Little Venice||Crossbench||no|
|Lord Chartres||Crossbench (front bench)||no|
|Viscount Colville of Culross||Crossbench (front bench)||no|
|The Earl of Cork and Orrery||Crossbench (front bench)||no|
|Lord Curry of Kirkharle||Crossbench (front bench)||no|
|The Earl of Erroll||Crossbench||no|
|Lord Grabiner||Crossbench (front bench)||no|
|Lord Houghton of Richmond||Crossbench||no|
|Lord Janvrin||Crossbench (front bench)||no|
|Lord Jay of Ewelme||Crossbench||no|
|Lord Kakkar||Crossbench (front bench)||no|
|Lord Kerr of Kinlochard||Crossbench (front bench)||no|
|Lord Laming||Crossbench (front bench)||no|
|Lord Patel||Crossbench (front bench)||no|
|Lord Powell of Bayswater||Crossbench (front bench)||no|
|Lord Stirrup||Crossbench (front bench)||no|
|Lord Holmes of Richmond||Non-affiliated (front bench)||no|