Agriculture Bill — New Clause After Clause 42 — Requirement for Agricultural and Food Imports to Meet Domestic Standards — 12 Oct 2020 at 21:00

The majority of MPs voted not to require agricultural and food imports to meet or exceed relevant domestic standards applying matters including food safety, the environment and animal health.

MPs were considering the Agriculture Bill[1].

The motion supported by the majority of MPs in this vote was:

  • That this House disagrees with Lords amendment 16.

Lords amendment 16[2] proposed the addition of a new clause after clause 42, to be titled:Requirement for agricultural and food imports to meet domestic standards and starting:

  • (1)Chapters of an international trade agreement that contain provisions relating to the importation of agricultural and food products into the United Kingdom may not be ratified unless the conditions in subsections(2) to (5) have been met.
  • (2)The condition in this subsection is that a Minister of the Crown has laid before Parliament a statement confirming that—
  • (a)the agreement contains an affirmation of the United Kingdom’s rights and obligations under the World Trade Organisation Sanitary and Phytosanitary Agreement, and
  • (b)any agricultural or food product imported into the United Kingdom under the agreement will have been produced or processed according to standards which, on the date of their importation, are equivalent to, or exceed, the relevant domestic standards and regulations in relation to—
  • (i)animal health and welfare,
  • (ii)protection of the environment,
  • (iii)food safety, hygiene and traceability, and
  • (iv)plant health.
  • (3)The condition in this subsection is that the Secretary of State has by regulations specified—
  • (a)the process by which the Secretary of State will determine—
  • (i)that the standards to which any agricultural or food product imported into the United Kingdom under a trade agreement is produced or processed are equivalent to, or exceed, the relevant domestic standards and regulations in relation to animal health and welfare, protection of the environment,food safety, hygiene and traceability, and plant health, and
  • (ii)that the enforcement of standards in relation to any product under subsection (3)(a)(i) is at least as effective as the enforcement of the equivalent domestic standards and regulations in the United Kingdom;
  • (b)the “relevant domestic standards and regulations” for the purposes of subsections (2)(b) and (3)(a)(i).
  • The condition in this subsection is that the chapters have been approved by a resolution of the House of Commons on a motion moved by a Minister of the Crown.
  • (5)The condition in this subsection is that a motion for the House of Lords to take note of the chapters has been tabled in the House of Lords by a Minister of the Crown and—
  • (a)the House of Lords has debated the motion, or
  • (b)the House of Lords has not concluded a debate on the motion before the end of the period of five Lords sitting days beginning with the first Lords sitting day after the day on which the House of Commons passes the resolution mentioned in subsection (4)
  • ...


Debate in Parliament |

Public Whip is run as a free not-for-profit free service. If you'd like to support us, please consider switching your electricity and/or gas to Bulb Energy who provide 100% renewable electricity and tend to be 20% cheaper than the 'Big Six'. They'll also pay any exit fees (up to £120) from your old supplier AND give you (and us) a £50 credit for joining up via our Bulb Referral Link.

Party Summary

Votes by party, red entries are votes against the majority for that party.

What is Tell? '+1 tell' means that in addition one member of that party was a teller for that division lobby.

What are Boths? An MP can vote both aye and no in the same division. The boths page explains this.

What is Turnout? This is measured against the total membership of the party at the time of the vote.

PartyMajority (Aye)Minority (No)BothTurnout
Alliance0 10100.0%
Con327 (+2 tell) 14094.2%
DUP0 4387.5%
Green0 10100.0%
Independent1 30100.0%
Lab0 191 (+2 tell)096.0%
LDem0 110100.0%
PC0 30100.0%
SDLP0 20100.0%
SNP0 470100.0%
Total:328 277395.3%

Rebel Voters - sorted by vote

MPs for which their vote in this division differed from the majority vote of their party. You can see all votes in this division, or every eligible MP who could have voted in this division

Sort by: Name | Constituency | Party | Vote

Peter AldousWaveneyConno
Tracey CrouchChatham and AylesfordConno
George FreemanMid NorfolkConno
Roger GaleNorth ThanetCon (front bench)no
Simon HoareNorth DorsetCon (front bench)no
Neil HudsonPenrith and The BorderCon (front bench)no
Jason McCartneyColne ValleyConno
Stephen McPartlandStevenageCon (front bench)no
Caroline NokesRomsey and Southampton NorthCon (front bench)no
Neil ParishTiverton and HonitonCon (front bench)no
Douglas RossMorayCon (front bench)no
Henry SmithCrawleyCon (front bench)no
Julian SturdyYork OuterCon (front bench)no
Theresa VilliersChipping BarnetCon (front bench)no
Ian Paisley JnrNorth AntrimDUP (front bench)both
Gavin RobinsonBelfast EastDUP (front bench)both
Sammy WilsonEast AntrimDUP (front bench)both

About the Project

The Public Whip is a not-for-profit, open source website created in 2003 by Francis Irving and Julian Todd and now run by Bairwell Ltd.

PublicWhip v2 codebase is currently under development - you can join the Slack group to find out more or email [email protected]

The Whip on the Web

Help keep PublicWhip alive