Health and Care Bill — Clause 35 — Report on assessing and meeting workforce needs — 25 Apr 2022 at 19:45

“circumstances that are likely to result in the need for the reconfiguration of NHS services”.
“costs accrued in meeting eligible needs”
“The regulations may not be made unless-
(a) the results of the Trailblazer pilot schemes have been evaluated, and the Secretary of State has laid that evaluation before Parliament, and
(b) the Secretary of State has completed a further general impact assessment covering distributional regional analysis”.
“the Government disagreed with the numbers”
“because we could not get approval to publish the document with any forecasts in it.”-[Official Report, House of Lords, 7 December 2021; Vol. 816, c. 1814.]
“The way that the NHS does workforce planning is at best opaque and at worst responsible for the unacceptable pressure on the current workforce which existed even before the pandemic.”
“In the next 25 years, the number of people older than 85 will double to 2.6 million”
“measures to adopt a sustainable long-term approach to workforce planning on a statutory footing.”

Debate in Parliament |

Public Whip is run as a free not-for-profit free service. If you'd like to support us, please consider switching your electricity and/or gas to Bulb Energy who provide 100% renewable electricity and tend to be 20% cheaper than the 'Big Six'. They'll also pay any exit fees (up to £120) from your old supplier AND give you (and us) a £50 credit for joining up via our Bulb Referral Link.

Party Summary

Votes by party, red entries are votes against the majority for that party.

What is Tell? '+1 tell' means that in addition one member of that party was a teller for that division lobby.

What are Boths? An MP can vote both aye and no in the same division. The boths page explains this.

What is Turnout? This is measured against the total membership of the party at the time of the vote.

PartyMajority (Aye)Minority (No)BothTurnout
Alliance0 10100.0%
Con275 (+2 tell) 11079.8%
DUP0 2025.0%
Green0 10100.0%
Independent1 1033.3%
Lab0 150 (+2 tell)076.0%
LDem0 12092.3%
PC0 30100.0%
SDLP0 1050.0%
Total:276 182077.6%

Rebel Voters - sorted by party

MPs for which their vote in this division differed from the majority vote of their party. You can see all votes in this division, or every eligible MP who could have voted in this division

Sort by: Name | Constituency | Party | Vote

NameConstituencyPartyVote
Peter AldousWaveneyCon (front bench)no
Harriett BaldwinWest WorcestershireCon (front bench)no
Steve BrineWinchesterCon (front bench)no
Philip DaviesShipleyCon (front bench)no
Philip HolloboneKetteringCon (front bench)no
Jeremy HuntSouth West SurreyCon (front bench)no
Jonathan LordWokingCon (front bench)no
Esther McVeyTattonCon (front bench)no
Andrew MitchellSutton ColdfieldConno
Bob NeillBromley and ChislehurstCon (front bench)no
Daniel PoulterCentral Suffolk and North IpswichCon (front bench)no

About the Project

The Public Whip is a not-for-profit, open source website created in 2003 by Francis Irving and Julian Todd and now run by Bairwell Ltd.

PublicWhip v2 codebase is currently under development - you can join the Slack group to find out more or email [email protected]

The Whip on the Web

Help keep PublicWhip alive