Digital Markets, Competition and Consumers Bill — Report (1st Day) — Amendment 23 — 11 Mar 2024 at 18:34
Moved by Lord Leong
23: Clause 29, page 16, line 13, leave out paragraph (c)Member’s explanatory statementThis amendment, alongside another in my name to Clause 29, would revert the Clause back to the one first introduced in the House of Commons. This would narrow the ability of bigger platforms to claim their anti-competitive behaviour presents countervailing benefits.
Ayes 209, Noes 193.
Party Summary
Votes by party, red entries are votes against the majority for that party.
What is Tell? '+1 tell' means that in addition one member of that party was a teller for that division lobby.
What is Turnout? This is measured against the total membership of the party at the time of the vote.| Party | Majority (Content) | Minority (Not-Content) | Turnout |
| Con | 3 | 179 (+2 tell) | 63.0% |
| Crossbench | 30 | 3 | 19.2% |
| DUP | 0 | 3 | 50.0% |
| Green | 2 | 0 | 100.0% |
| Independent Labour | 1 | 0 | 100.0% |
| Judge | 1 | 0 | 11.1% |
| Lab | 99 (+2 tell) | 0 | 59.1% |
| LDem | 62 | 0 | 75.6% |
| Non-affiliated | 9 | 5 | 25.5% |
| UUP | 0 | 1 | 50.0% |
| Total: | 207 | 191 | 50.8% |
Rebel Voters - sorted by party
Lords for which their vote in this division differed from the majority vote of their party. You can see all votes in this division, or every eligible lord who could have voted in this division
| Name | Party | Vote |
| Lord Black of Brentwood | Con (front bench) | aye |
| Baroness Harding of Winscombe | Con (front bench) | aye |
| Lord Lansley | Con | aye |
| Baroness Cavendish of Little Venice | Crossbench | no |
| Lord Hogan-Howe | Crossbench (front bench) | no |
| Viscount Waverley | Crossbench | no |
| Lord Gadhia | Non-affiliated | no |
| Baroness Hoey | Non-affiliated | no |
| Lord Taylor of Warwick | Non-affiliated | no |
| Lord Tyrie | Non-affiliated (front bench) | no |
| Lord Young of Old Windsor | Non-affiliated (front bench) | no |