Voting Comparison — Lord Foster of Bishop Auckland
to Lord Giddens

Lord Foster of Bishop Auckland

Note: our records only go back to 1997 for the Commons and 2001 for the Lords (more details).

ConstituencyFromToPartyRebellions (explain...)Attendance (explain...)Teller
House of Lords 22 Jun 2005 still in office Lab 6 votes out of 746, 0.8% 746 votes out of 1440, 51.8% 0 times
Bishop Auckland 7 Jun 2001 11 Apr 2005 Lab 4 votes out of 874, 0.5% 874 votes out of 1246, 70.1% 0 times
Bishop Auckland 1 May 1997 14 May 2001 Lab 8 votes out of 862, 0.9% 862 votes out of 1273, 67.7% 0 times

Voting Differences

HouseDateSubjectLord Foster of Bishop AucklandLord GiddensRôle
Lords14 Mar 2007House of Lords Reform — Fully Elected — rejected Majorityaye disagrees with policy
Lords14 Mar 2007House of Lords: Reform (80pc elected, 20pc appointed) Majorityaye disagrees with policy
Lords31 Jan 2006Speakership of the House Majorityaye disagrees with policy
HouseDateSubjectMr Derek FosterLord GiddensRôle
no votes listed
HouseDateSubjectMr Derek FosterLord GiddensRôle
no votes listed

About the Project

The Public Whip is a not-for-profit, open source website created in 2003 by Francis Irving and Julian Todd and now run by Bairwell Ltd.

PublicWhip v2 codebase is currently under development - you can join the Slack group to find out more or email [email protected]

The Whip on the Web

Help keep PublicWhip alive