House of Lords Reform — Fully Elected — rejected — 14 Mar 2007 at 17:07
The majority Not-Contents rejected a proposal to fully elect the House of Lords.[1]
- [1] Lord Falconer of Thoroton, 14 March 2007, House of Lords
Public Whip is run as a free not-for-profit service. If you'd like to support us, please
consider switching your (UK) electricity and/or gas to Octopus Energy or tip us via Ko-Fi.
Party Summary
Votes by party, red entries are votes against the majority for that party.
What is Tell? '+1 tell' means that in addition one member of that party was a teller for that division lobby.
What is Turnout? This is measured against the total membership of the party at the time of the vote.| Party | Majority (Not-Content) | Minority (Content) | Turnout |
| Bishop | 4 | 0 | 15.4% |
| Con | 134 (+1 tell) | 11 | 70.2% |
| Crossbench | 86 | 8 | 49.7% |
| DUP | 3 | 0 | 100.0% |
| Independent Labour | 0 | 1 | 100.0% |
| Lab | 81 (+1 tell) | 59 (+1 tell) | 65.7% |
| LDem | 8 | 40 (+1 tell) | 62.0% |
| UKIP | 1 | 0 | 50.0% |
| UUP | 1 | 0 | 100.0% |
| Total: | 318 | 119 | 60.8% |
Rebel Voters - sorted by party
Lords for which their vote in this division differed from the majority vote of their party. You can see all votes in this division, or every eligible lord who could have voted in this division