Nationality, Immigration and Asylum Bill — 31 Oct 2002 at 22:37
Resolved in the negative, and amendment disagreed to accordingly.
[Amendments 89 and 90 not moved].
moved Amendment No. 91:
Page 52, line 29, at end insert-
"(2A) If the Secretary of State certifies under subsection (2) that a claim is clearly unfounded, the person who made the claim may, with the permission of the Immigration Appeal Tribunal, appeal to the Tribunal against the certificate.
(2B) A party to an appeal to the Tribunal under subsection (2A) may apply to the High Court, or in Scotland to the Court of Session, for a review of the Tribunal's decision on the ground that the Tribunal made an error of law.
(2C) Where an application is made under subsection (2B)-
(a) it shall be determined by a single judge by reference only to written submissions,
(b) the judge may affirm or reverse the Tribunal's decision, and
(c) the judge's decision shall be final."
On Question, Whether the said amendment (No. 91) shall be agreed to?
Their Lordships divided: Contents, 46; Not-Contents, 71.
Lords for which their vote in this division differed from the majority vote of their party are marked in red. Also shows which lords were ministers at the time of this vote. You can also see every eligible lord including those who did not vote in this division.