Voting Record — Lord Bernstein of Craigweil (13506)
Lord Bernstein of Craigweil
Note: our records only go back to 1997 for the Commons and 2001 for the Lords (more details).
|From||To||Party||Rebellions (explain...)||Attendance (explain...)||Teller|
|22 May 2000||13 Apr 2010||Lab||10 votes out of 855, 1.2%||855 votes out of 1375, 62.2%||0 times|
- See Lord Bernstein of Craigweil's Parliamentary speeches at: TheyWorkForYou.com
Votes in parliament for which this Lord's vote differed from the majority vote of their party (Rebel), or in which this Lord was a teller (Teller), or both (Rebel Teller).
|House||Date||Subject||Lord Bernstein of Craigweil||Lab Vote||Rôle|
|Lords||14 Mar 2007||House of Lords Reform — Fully Elected — rejected||minority||no||Rebel|
|Lords||14 Mar 2007||House of Lords: Reform (Fully Appointed)||minority||aye||Rebel|
|Lords||5 Jul 2004||Children Bill [HL]||minority||no||Rebel|
|31 Jul 2003||Stopped being Member, Draft Corruption Bill (Joint Committee)|
|Lords||23 Jun 2003||Communications Bill||Majority||no||Rebel|
|24 Mar 2003||Became Member, Draft Corruption Bill (Joint Committee)|
|Lords||4 Feb 2003||House of Lords Reform — 60 per cent elected/40 per cent appointed||minority||no||Rebel|
|Lords||4 Feb 2003||House of Lords Reform — 80 per cent elected/20 per cent appointed||minority||no||Rebel|
|Lords||4 Feb 2003||House of Lords Reform — fully appointed||minority||aye||Rebel|
|Lords||19 Mar 2002||Hunting with dogs: Ban||Majority||aye||Rebel|
|Lords||23 Jul 2001||House of Lords' Offices: Select Committee Report||minority||no||Rebel|
|Lords||26 Mar 2001||Hunting Bill||Majority||no||Rebel|
This chart shows the percentage agreement between this Lord and each of the policies in the database, according to their voting record.
Shows which Lords voted most similarly to this one in the 1997-2001, Westminster Parliament. This is measured from 0% agreement (never voted the same) to 100% (always voted the same). Only votes that both Lords attended are counted. This may reveal relationships between Lords that were previously unsuspected. Or it may be nonsense.
|100.0%||Baroness Hale of Richmond||Judge|