[S2M-4864.5 (Amendment)] Decision Time — 28 Sep 2006 at 17:02

This looks like the vote on S2M-4864.5

The description in the bulletin on 2006-09-28 is:

*S2M-4864.5 Jackie Baillie: Trident—As an amendment to motion (S2M-4864) in the name of Roseanna Cunningham, leave out from "believes" to end and insert "notes that decisions pertaining to national defence, such as any future replacement of Trident, are reserved to the Westminster parliament; notes that the United Nations Security Council plays a vital role in working for peace and security on a global basis; welcomes the United Kingdom’s role within both the United Nations and NATO; notes that the General Election manifestos for 2005 of the Labour, Conservative and Liberal Democrat parties called for the retention of an independent nuclear deterrent; believes that there should be the widest possible debate on the future security of Scotland, the United Kingdom and the wider world, covering all options on Trident, including non-replacement; notes the comments of the UK Government that no decisions on replacing Trident have yet been taken; welcomes the significant reductions in the UK’s nuclear weapons arsenal; is committed to the goal of the global elimination of nuclear, biological and chemical weapons, and wishes to see the United Kingdom continue to work both bilaterally and through the United Nations to urge states not yet party to non-proliferation instruments to become so, to remain committed to the Comprehensive Nuclear Test Ban Treaty and to make further progress toward significant reductions in the nuclear arsenals of the major nuclear powers." Supported by: Scott Barrie*

You can search for this motion (S2M-4864.5) on TheyWorkForYou

Text Introducing Division:

The first question is, that amendment S2M-4864.5, in the name of Jackie Baillie, which seeks to amend motion S2M-4864, in the name of Roseanna Cunningham, on Trident, be agreed to. Are we agreed?

No.

There will be a division.

Debate in Parliament | Source |