[S2M-5510] Decision Time — 1 Feb 2007 at 17:00
This looks like the vote on S2M-5510
The description in the bulletin on 2007-01-31 is:
*S2M-5510 Mr Mark Ruskell: Scottish Water—That the Parliament notes growing pressure for Scottish Water to be privatised; further notes the substantial improvements that have been made in Scottish Water’s performance, all of this having been achieved while keeping Scottish Water in the public sector; notes the Water Industry Commission’s lack of a wider social and environmental remit and its use of a regulatory model more suited to a private utility than to a public one; considers that improving the service, upgrading the water and sewerage system, reducing leakages and ensuring effective regulation should not centre on short-term efficiency measures but on the quality and safe delivery of services in the long term, and affirms its commitment to keeping Scottish Water under public ownership and control. Supported by: Mark Ballard*
You can search for this motion (S2M-5510) on TheyWorkForYou
Text Introducing Division:
The next question is, that motion S2M-5510, in the name of Mark Ruskell, on Scottish Water, as amended, be agreed to. Are we agreed?
No.
There will be a division.
All Votes Cast - sorted by constituency
MPs for which their vote in this division differed from the majority vote of their party are marked in red. Also shows which MPs were ministers at the time of this vote. You can also see every eligible MP including those who did not vote in this division.
Sort by: Name | Constituency | Party | Vote