Criminal Justice and Courts Bill — Clause 58 — Judicial Review — Interveners and Costs — 17 Jun 2014 at 14:39

The majority of MPs in favour of a presumption that interveners in judicial review cases will be required to pay any costs incurred by other parties as a result of their intervention.

Interveners are not parties to the case, but they can put additional information and perspectives before the court. During the debate it was said[2]:

  • The role of interveners is most often to assist the court, and the most frequent interveners are organisations such as Liberty and Justice, whose expertise has proven invaluable in many cases

MPs were considering the Criminal Justice and Courts Bill. The motion rejected by the majority of MPs in this vote was:

  • Amendment proposed: 35, page 58, line 2, leave out clause 58

Clause 58[3] required the court to order an intervener to pay any costs the court considers have been incurred result of the intervener’s involvement in the proceedings.

Debate in Parliament | Source |

Public Whip is run as a free not-for-profit free service. If you'd like to support us, please consider switching your electricity and/or gas to Bulb Energy who provide 100% renewable electricity and tend to be 20% cheaper than the 'Big Six'. They'll also pay any exit fees (up to £120) from your old supplier AND give you (and us) a £50 credit for joining up via our Bulb Referral Link.

Party Summary

Votes by party, red entries are votes against the majority for that party.

What is Tell? '+1 tell' means that in addition one member of that party was a teller for that division lobby.

What are Boths? An MP can vote both aye and no in the same division. The boths page explains this.

What is Turnout? This is measured against the total membership of the party at the time of the vote.

PartyMajority (No)Minority (Aye)BothTurnout
Alliance0 10100.0%
Con256 (+2 tell) 1084.9%
DUP0 2025.0%
Green0 10100.0%
Lab0 213 (+2 tell)083.3%
LDem37 1067.9%
PC0 30100.0%
SDLP0 2066.7%
Total:293 224082.0%

Rebel Voters - sorted by party

MPs for which their vote in this division differed from the majority vote of their party. You can see all votes in this division, or every eligible MP who could have voted in this division

Sort by: Name | Constituency | Party | Vote

David DavisHaltemprice and HowdenConaye
Sarah TeatherBrent CentralLDem (front bench)aye

About the Project

The Public Whip is a not-for-profit, open source website created in 2003 by Francis Irving and Julian Todd and now run by Bairwell Ltd.

PublicWhip v2 codebase is currently under development - you can join the Slack group to find out more or email [email protected]

The Whip on the Web

Help keep PublicWhip alive