Health Protection (Coronavirus, Wearing of Face Coverings in a Relevant Place and on Public Transport) (England) (Amendment) Regulations 2020 — Increased Penalties for Repeated Breaches — 23 Sep 2020 at 20:40

The majority of MPs voted to support increased penalties for repeated breaches of the law requiring the wearing of facemasks in situations including shops and using public transport.

The motion supported by a majority of MPs in this vote was:

The regulations supported by a majority of MPs in this vote amended the sections on Fixed Penalty Notices within the The Health Protection (Coronavirus, Wearing of Face Coverings on Public Transport) (England) Regulations 2020 and The Health Protection (Coronavirus, Wearing of Face Coverings in a Relevant Place) (England) Regulations 2020. These regulations required the wearing of facemasks, in England, in shops, banks, indoor shopping centres and while using public transport.

In both cases the penalties were originally £100 reducing to £50 if paid within 14 days with no provision for higher penalties for subsequent notices issued to the same person. The regulations supported by a majority of MPs in this vote introduced a £200 fine for a second notice, doubling on each subsequent notice to a maximum of £3,200 for a sixth notice and any further notices.

These higher penalties came into force on 28 August 2020. This vote was held on 23 September 2010.

Debate in Parliament |

Public Whip is run as a free not-for-profit free service. If you'd like to support us, please consider switching your electricity and/or gas to Bulb Energy who provide 100% renewable electricity and tend to be 20% cheaper than the 'Big Six'. They'll also pay any exit fees (up to £120) from your old supplier AND give you (and us) a £50 credit for joining up via our Bulb Referral Link.

Party Summary

Votes by party, red entries are votes against the majority for that party.

What is Tell? '+1 tell' means that in addition one member of that party was a teller for that division lobby.

What are Boths? An MP can vote both aye and no in the same division. The boths page explains this.

What is Turnout? This is measured against the total membership of the party at the time of the vote.

PartyMajority (Aye)Minority (No)BothTurnout
Alliance1 00100.0%
Con326 2090.1%
DUP1 4062.5%
Green1 00100.0%
Lab0 000.0%
LDem5 0045.5%
Total:334 6057.9%

Rebel Voters - sorted by party

MPs for which their vote in this division differed from the majority vote of their party. You can see all votes in this division, or every eligible MP who could have voted in this division

Sort by: Name | Constituency | Party | Vote

NameConstituencyPartyVote
Philip HolloboneKetteringCon (front bench)no
Desmond SwayneNew Forest WestCon (front bench)no
Gavin RobinsonBelfast EastDUP (front bench)aye

About the Project

The Public Whip is a not-for-profit, open source website created in 2003 by Francis Irving and Julian Todd and now run by Bairwell Ltd.

PublicWhip v2 codebase is currently under development - you can join the Slack group to find out more or email [email protected]

The Whip on the Web

Help keep PublicWhip alive