Prevention of Terrorism Bill — Amendment to Clause 1 — Power to make control orders — 28 Feb 2005 at 21:45
The majority of MPs voted against giving a greater role to the courts in relation to the imposition of control orders.
The Aye-voters failed to make a series of changes to the text of the Prevention of Terrorism Bill
These changes for the most part replaced "Secretary of State" with "court". For example, the phrase "The Secretary of State may make a control order against an individual" would become "The Secretary of State may apply to the court for a control order...".
Party Summary
Votes by party, red entries are votes against the majority for that party.
What is Tell? '+1 tell' means that in addition one member of that party was a teller for that division lobby.
What are Boths? An MP can vote both aye and no in the same division. The boths page explains this.
What is Turnout? This is measured against the total membership of the party at the time of the vote.
| Party | Majority (No) | Minority (Aye) | Both | Turnout |
| Con | 0 | 138 | 0 | 85.7% |
| DUP | 0 | 4 | 0 | 57.1% |
| Independent | 0 | 1 | 0 | 33.3% |
| Lab | 266 (+2 tell) | 60 (+2 tell) | 0 | 80.9% |
| LDem | 0 | 38 | 0 | 69.1% |
| PC | 0 | 4 | 0 | 100.0% |
| SNP | 0 | 4 | 0 | 80.0% |
| UUP | 0 | 4 | 0 | 80.0% |
| Total: | 266 | 253 | 0 | 80.7% |
Rebel Voters - sorted by party
MPs for which their vote in this division differed from the majority vote of their party. You can see all votes in this division, or every eligible MP who could have voted in this division
Sort by: Name | Constituency | Party | Vote