House of Lords Reform — Fully Elected — rejected — 14 Mar 2007 at 17:07
The majority Not-Contents rejected a proposal to fully elect the House of Lords.[1]
- [1] Lord Falconer of Thoroton, 14 March 2007, House of Lords
Public Whip is run as a free not-for-profit service. If you'd like to support us, please
consider switching your (UK) electricity and/or gas to Octopus Energy or tip us via Ko-Fi.
Party Summary
Votes by party, red entries are votes against the majority for that party.
What is Tell? '+1 tell' means that in addition one member of that party was a teller for that division lobby.
What is Turnout? This is measured against the total membership of the party at the time of the vote.| Party | Majority (Not-Content) | Minority (Content) | Turnout |
| Bishop | 4 | 0 | 15.4% |
| Con | 134 (+1 tell) | 11 | 70.2% |
| Crossbench | 86 | 8 | 49.7% |
| DUP | 3 | 0 | 100.0% |
| Independent Labour | 0 | 1 | 100.0% |
| Lab | 81 (+1 tell) | 59 (+1 tell) | 65.7% |
| LDem | 8 | 40 (+1 tell) | 62.0% |
| UKIP | 1 | 0 | 50.0% |
| UUP | 1 | 0 | 100.0% |
| Total: | 318 | 119 | 60.8% |
All lords Eligible to Vote - sorted by party
Includes lords who were absent (or abstained) from this vote.