London Local Authorities Bill — Clause 4 — Power to Require Name and Address for Council Officers, PCSOs and Accredited Individuals When Issuing FPNs — 7 Dec 2011 at 16:00
The majority of MPs voted to approve giving authorised council officers, Police Community Support Officers and people designated by a Chief Officer of Police under the community safety accreditation scheme the power to require an individual's name and address when they are proposing to issue a council fixed penalty notice.
The fixed penalty notices in question are those provided for under section 61 of the London Local Authorities Act 2007
MPs were considering the London Local Authorities Bill[1]. The amendment rejected in this vote was:
- Amendment 9, leave out clause 4
Clause 4[2], titled Power to require name and address had the effect described above.
Party Summary
Votes by party, red entries are votes against the majority for that party.
What is Tell? '+1 tell' means that in addition one member of that party was a teller for that division lobby.
What are Boths? An MP can vote both aye and no in the same division. The boths page explains this.
What is Turnout? This is measured against the total membership of the party at the time of the vote.
| Party | Majority (No) | Minority (Aye) | Both | Turnout |
| Alliance | 1 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% |
| Con | 26 (+1 tell) | 48 (+2 tell) | 0 | 25.2% |
| DUP | 0 | 6 | 0 | 75.0% |
| Independent | 1 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% |
| Lab | 98 (+1 tell) | 0 | 0 | 38.5% |
| LDem | 16 | 1 | 1 | 31.6% |
| PC | 1 | 1 | 0 | 66.7% |
| Total: | 143 | 56 | 1 | 32.2% |
Rebel Voters - sorted by party
MPs for which their vote in this division differed from the majority vote of their party. You can see all votes in this division, or every eligible MP who could have voted in this division
Sort by: Name | Constituency | Party | Vote