Voting Record — Lord Christopher (13256)
Note: our records only go back to 1997 for the Commons and 2001 for the Lords (more details).
|From||To||Party||Rebellions (explain...)||Attendance (explain...)||Teller|
|30 Nov 1997||still in office||Lab||4 votes out of 1196, 0.3%||1196 votes out of 2357, 50.7%||0 times|
- See Lord Christopher's Parliamentary speeches at: TheyWorkForYou.com
Votes in parliament for which this Lord's vote differed from the majority vote of their party (Rebel), or in which this Lord was a teller (Teller), or both (Rebel Teller).
|House||Date||Subject||Lord Christopher||Lab Vote||Rôle|
|Lords||31 Jan 2017||High Speed Rail (London–West Midlands) Bill - Third Reading||minority||no||Rebel|
|12 May 2016||Stopped being Member, Consolidation, &c., Bills (Joint Committee)|
|17 Jun 2015||Became Member, Consolidation, &c., Bills (Joint Committee)|
|30 Mar 2015||Stopped being Member, Consolidation, &c., Bills (Joint Committee)|
|Lords||8 Nov 2011||Procedure of the House (Proposal 1) — Motion to Resolve||Majority||aye||Rebel|
|Lords||7 Jul 2009||Coroners and Justice Bill — New Clause — Assisted Suicide||Majority||aye||Rebel|
|Lords||11 May 2009||Postal Services Bill [HL] — Report (1st Day)||minority||no||Rebel|
|13 Nov 2008||Stopped being Member, Audit Committee (Lords)|
|13 Nov 2002||Became Member, Audit Committee (Lords)|
|27 May 1999||Became Member, Consolidation, &c., Bills (Joint Committee)|
This chart shows the percentage agreement between this Lord and each of the policies in the database, according to their voting record.
|36%||Civil aviation pollution - For limiting|
|71%||Homosexuality - Equal rights|
|99%||Identity cards - For introduction|
|0%||No detention without charge or trial|
|100%||Smoking ban - In favour|
|21%||Transexuality - Against legal recognition|
Shows which Lords voted most similarly to this one in the 1997-2001, Westminster Parliament. This is measured from 0% agreement (never voted the same) to 100% (always voted the same). Only votes that both Lords attended are counted. This may reveal relationships between Lords that were previously unsuspected. Or it may be nonsense.
|100.0%||Baroness Campbell of Loughborough||Crossbench|