Hunting Bill — Lords Amendment — 17 Nov 2004 at 19:57
A vote to insist on the previous Lords version of the Hunting Bill (ie registered hunting) in place of the Commons amendment of a ban on hunting with dogs.
This was the second round of Parliamentary "ping-pong".
Their Lordships divided: Contents, 188; Not-Contents, 79.
Public Whip is run as a free not-for-profit service. If you'd like to support us, please
consider switching your (UK) electricity and/or gas to Octopus Energy or tip us via Ko-Fi.
Party Summary
Votes by party, red entries are votes against the majority for that party.
What is Tell? '+1 tell' means that in addition one member of that party was a teller for that division lobby.
What is Turnout? This is measured against the total membership of the party at the time of the vote.| Party | Majority (Content) | Minority (Not-Content) | Turnout |
| Bishop | 3 | 1 | 15.4% |
| Con | 112 (+1 tell) | 1 | 54.3% |
| Crossbench | 30 | 2 | 18.1% |
| Green | 1 | 0 | 100.0% |
| Independent Labour | 1 | 0 | 100.0% |
| Lab | 17 (+1 tell) | 59 (+2 tell) | 38.5% |
| LDem | 17 | 11 | 40.6% |
| Total: | 181 | 74 | 37.6% |
All lords Eligible to Vote - sorted by party
Includes lords who were absent (or abstained) from this vote.