[S1M-408.1 (Amendment)] Decision Time — 13 Jan 2000 at 17:03
This looks like the vote on S1M-408.1
The description in the bulletin on 2000-01-13 is:
*S1M-408.1 Bill Aitken: Housing—As an amendment to motion (S1M-408) in the name of Ms Wendy Alexander, leave out from "welcomes" to end and insert "notes the Executive’s proposals to achieve this and notes that the Executive will bring forward a Housing Bill; calls upon the Executive to include within this Bill measures to deal with the alarming problem of homelessness which has increased dramatically since May 1997; welcomes the Executive’s commitment to extend the Right to Buy to Housing Association tenants, but emphasises that measures may be necessary to safeguard individual Associations where the take-up of this right could prejudice the operation, viability or success of these Associations."
You can search for this motion (S1M-408.1) on TheyWorkForYou
Text Introducing Division:
The second question is that amendment S1M-408.1, in the name of Bill Aitken, which seeks to amend motion S1M-408, in the name of Ms Wendy Alexander, on housing, be agreed to. Are we agreed?
No.
There will be a division.
Party Summary
Votes by party, red entries are votes against the majority for that party.
Party | Majority (No) | Minority (Aye) | Abstentions | Turnout |
Con | 0 | 17 | 0 | 94.4% |
Green | 1 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% |
Independent | 3 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% |
Lab | 50 | 0 | 0 | 90.9% |
LDem | 13 | 0 | 0 | 81.3% |
SNP | 27 | 0 | 0 | 81.8% |
SSP | 1 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% |
Total: | 95 | 17 | 0 | 88.2% |
All MPs Eligible to Vote - sorted by constituency
Includes MPs who were absent (or abstained) from this vote.
Sort by: Name | Constituency | Party | Vote