[S1M-586.1 (Amendment)] Decision Time — 24 Feb 2000 at 17:32
This looks like the vote on S1M-586.1
The description in the bulletin on 2000-02-24 is:
*S1M-586.1 Mrs Lyndsay McIntosh: Physical Punishment of Children—As an amendment to motion (S1M-586) in the name of Mr Jim Wallace, insert after "Scotland", "agrees with its view that parents should continue to have the right to rebuke physically their children by reasonable means, if they so choose, in order to maintain discipline both in the present day and for future generations, calls upon the Scottish Executive to clarify the definition of reasonable chastisement so that both parents and children are sure of their rights within the law," Supported by: Mr Brian Monteith*
You can search for this motion (S1M-586.1) on TheyWorkForYou
Text Introducing Division:
The fourth question is, that amendment S1M-586.1, in the name of Lyndsay McIntosh, which seeks to amend motion S1M-586, in the name of Jim Wallace, on physical punishment of children, be agreed to. Are we agreed?
No.
There will be a division. Members who want to vote for Mrs McIntosh's amendment should press the yes button now.
Party Summary
Votes by party, red entries are votes against the majority for that party.
| Party | Majority (No) | Minority (Aye) | Abstentions | Turnout |
| Con | 0 | 12 | 0 | 66.7% |
| Green | 1 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% |
| Independent | 3 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% |
| Lab | 45 | 1 | 0 | 83.6% |
| LDem | 12 | 0 | 0 | 75.0% |
| SNP | 25 | 0 | 0 | 75.8% |
| SSP | 1 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% |
| Total: | 87 | 13 | 0 | 78.7% |
All MPs Eligible to Vote - sorted by party
Includes MPs who were absent (or abstained) from this vote.
Sort by: Name | Constituency | Party | Vote