[S1M-1357] Decision Time — 16 Nov 2000 at 17:08
This looks like the vote on S1M-1357
The description in the bulletin on 2000-11-15 is:
*S1M-1357 Henry McLeish: Implications of the Chancellor's pre-Budget Statement for the Scottish Executive-That the Parliament notes the implications of the Chancellor's pre-Budget statement for the Scottish Executive. Supported by: Mr Jim Wallace*
You can search for this motion (S1M-1357) on TheyWorkForYou
Text Introducing Division:
The eighth question is, that motion S1M-1357, in the name of Henry McLeish, on the implications of the chancellor's pre-budget statement for the Scottish Executive, be agreed to. Are we agreed?
No.
There will be a division.
Party Summary
Votes by party, red entries are votes against the majority for that party.
| Party | Majority (Aye) | Minority (No) | Abstentions | Turnout |
| Con | 0 | 18 | 0 | 94.7% |
| Green | 1 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% |
| Independent | 2 | 0 | 0 | 66.7% |
| Lab | 41 | 0 | 0 | 75.9% |
| LDem | 14 | 0 | 0 | 87.5% |
| SNP | 24 | 0 | 0 | 72.7% |
| SSP | 0 | 1 | 0 | 100.0% |
| Total: | 82 | 19 | 0 | 79.5% |
All MPs Eligible to Vote - sorted by constituency
Includes MPs who were absent (or abstained) from this vote.
Sort by: Name | Constituency | Party | Vote