[S1M-1825.1 (Amendment)] Decision Time — 5 Apr 2001 at 17:15
This looks like the vote on S1M-1825.1
The description in the bulletin on 2001-04-05 is:
*S1M-1825.1 Mr Kenneth Gibson: Structural Funds—As an amendment to motion (S1M-1825) in the name of Angus MacKay, leave out from "the steps" to end and insert "steps being taken by the Scottish Executive to develop a broader strategy in relation to European funding issues in preparation for enlargement of the European Union, but notes the failure of the Scottish Office to secure the retention of Objective One status for any area of Scotland by re-drawing the regional map as was successfully done for their own regions by the Welsh Office, Ireland, Sweden and Finland, thus depriving the Executive of vital resources needed to develop its Structural Funds Programmes and reducing the scope, impact and likely success of the outcomes sought by both it and the Parliament." Supported by: Brian Adam*, Fiona Hyslop*, Mr Adam Ingram*
You can search for this motion (S1M-1825.1) on TheyWorkForYou
Text Introducing Division:
The first question is, that amendment S1M-1825.1, in the name of Kenny Gibson, which seeks to amend motion S1M-1825, in the name of Angus MacKay, on structural funds, be agreed to. Are we agreed?
No.
There will be a division. I ask members to check that the light in front of their card is not illuminated.
Party Summary
Votes by party, red entries are votes against the majority for that party.
| Party | Majority (No) | Minority (Aye) | Abstentions | Turnout |
| Con | 14 | 0 | 0 | 73.7% |
| Independent | 0 | 2 | 0 | 66.7% |
| Lab | 45 | 0 | 0 | 81.8% |
| LDem | 11 | 0 | 0 | 68.8% |
| SNP | 0 | 22 | 0 | 66.7% |
| SSP | 0 | 1 | 0 | 100.0% |
| Total: | 70 | 25 | 0 | 74.8% |
All MPs Eligible to Vote - sorted by constituency
Includes MPs who were absent (or abstained) from this vote.
Sort by: Name | Constituency | Party | Vote