[S1M-2207.1 (Amendment)] Decision Time — 20 Sep 2001 at 17:01
This looks like the vote on S1M-2207.1
The description in the bulletin on 2001-09-20 is:
*S1M-2207.1 Shona Robison: Improving Patient Care-As an amendment to motion (S1M-2207) in the name of David McLetchie, leave out from "welcomes" to end and insert "notes that, as a result of successive government policies, Scotland has become the PFI capital of Europe and that PFI is the most expensive method of financing hospital building; further notes that the privatisation of domestic services in hospitals presided over by the last Conservative government has resulted in a deterioration of standards of cleanliness in hospitals and record levels of hospital-acquired infections; believes that further private involvement in the delivery of health services is not in the interests of patients, and is committed to rebuilding a public health service in Scotland that is capable of delivering the highest quality of care for all our citizens." Supported by: Kay Ullrich*, Colin Campbell*, Brian Adam*, Michael Russell*, Nicola Sturgeon*
You can search for this motion (S1M-2207.1) on TheyWorkForYou
Text Introducing Division:
The next question is that amendment S1M-2207.1, in the name of Shona Robison, which seeks to amend motion S1M-2207, in the name of David McLetchie, on improving patient care, as amended, be agreed to. Are we agreed?
No.
There will be a division.
Party Summary
Votes by party, red entries are votes against the majority for that party.
| Party | Majority (No) | Minority (Aye) | Abstentions | Turnout |
| Con | 16 | 0 | 0 | 84.2% |
| Green | 0 | 0 | 1 | 100.0% |
| Independent | 0 | 2 | 0 | 66.7% |
| Lab | 45 | 0 | 0 | 81.8% |
| LDem | 13 | 0 | 0 | 81.3% |
| SNP | 0 | 12 | 0 | 36.4% |
| SSP | 0 | 1 | 0 | 100.0% |
| Total: | 74 | 15 | 1 | 70.3% |
All MPs Eligible to Vote - sorted by party
Includes MPs who were absent (or abstained) from this vote.
Sort by: Name | Constituency | Party | Vote