[S1M-2839.1 (Amendment)] Decision Time — 7 Mar 2002 at 17:02
This looks like the vote on S1M-2839.1
The description in the bulletin on 2002-03-07 is:
*S1M-2839.1 Malcolm Chisholm: Community Care—As an amendment to motion (S1M-2839) in the name of Mary Scanlon, leave out from "notes" to end and insert "acknowledges the progress that is being made towards joint resourcing and joint management of older people’s services; looks forward to further developments in the Joint Future agenda; welcomes the provision of significant extra resources for dealing with the problems of delayed discharge and care home fees, and recognises that such resources are part of the biggest ever investment in care services for older people." Supported by: Mrs Mary Mulligan*, Hugh Henry*
You can search for this motion (S1M-2839.1) on TheyWorkForYou
Text Introducing Division:
The fourth question is, that amendment S1M-2839.1, in the name of Malcolm Chisholm, which seeks to amend the motion in the name of Mary Scanlon, on community care, be agreed to. Are we agreed?
No.
There will be a division.
Party Summary
Votes by party, red entries are votes against the majority for that party.
| Party | Majority (Aye) | Minority (No) | Abstentions | Turnout |
| Con | 0 | 18 | 0 | 94.7% |
| Green | 1 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% |
| Independent | 0 | 1 | 2 | 100.0% |
| Lab | 49 | 0 | 0 | 89.1% |
| LDem | 14 | 0 | 0 | 87.5% |
| SNP | 0 | 0 | 27 | 81.8% |
| SSP | 0 | 0 | 1 | 100.0% |
| Total: | 64 | 19 | 30 | 88.3% |
All MPs Eligible to Vote - sorted by vote
Includes MPs who were absent (or abstained) from this vote.
Sort by: Name | Constituency | Party | Vote