[S1M-3641.2 (Amendment)] Decision Time — 28 Nov 2002 at 17:00
This looks like the vote on S1M-3641.2
The description in the bulletin on 2002-11-28 is:
*S1M-3641.2 Mr Jim Wallace: Drugs Courts—As an amendment to motion (S1M-3641) in the name of Bill Aitken, leave out from "notes" to end and insert "welcomes the commitment of the Scottish Executive to address the problem of drug misusing offenders by establishing pilot drugs courts, the success of Drugs Treatment and Testing Orders and the Scottish Drugs Enforcement Agency, the additional resources made available to agencies within the criminal justice system, local authorities and the NHS to support its co-ordinated approach to reducing or eliminating the dependence on or propensity to misuse drugs and its integrated strategy to tackling drug-related crime and reducing the impact which this has on communities." Supported by: Hugh Henry*
You can search for this motion (S1M-3641.2) on TheyWorkForYou
Text Introducing Division:
The next question is, that amendment S1M-3641.2, in the name of Jim Wallace, which seeks to amend motion S1M-3641, in the name of Bill Aitken, on drugs courts, be agreed to. Are we agreed?
No.
There will be a division.
Party Summary
Votes by party, red entries are votes against the majority for that party.
| Party | Majority (Aye) | Minority (No) | Abstentions | Turnout |
| Con | 0 | 15 | 0 | 78.9% |
| Green | 0 | 0 | 1 | 100.0% |
| Independent | 1 | 0 | 0 | 33.3% |
| Lab | 49 | 0 | 0 | 89.1% |
| LDem | 11 | 0 | 0 | 68.8% |
| SNP | 0 | 2 | 25 | 81.8% |
| SSP | 0 | 0 | 1 | 100.0% |
| Total: | 61 | 17 | 27 | 82.0% |
All MPs Eligible to Vote - sorted by name
Includes MPs who were absent (or abstained) from this vote.
Sort by: Name | Constituency | Party | Vote