[S1M-3641] Decision Time — 28 Nov 2002 at 17:00
This looks like the vote on S1M-3641
The description in the bulletin on 2002-11-27 is:
*S1M-3641 Bill Aitken: Drug Courts—That the Parliament notes the growing prevalence of drug abuse and drug-related crimes; regrets that the Scottish Executive continues to send out mixed messages on drugs; further regrets that the Executive’s flagship drug courts have become a means of avoiding a prison term, and therefore calls on the Executive to ensure that (a) those sent to drug courts have committed only a minimal number of offences, (b) there are sufficient resources to ensure that those who are sentenced by drug courts have the option of immediate and instant treatment to undergo rehabilitation and (c) any breach of orders from the drug courts are dealt with properly.
You can search for this motion (S1M-3641) on TheyWorkForYou
Text Introducing Division:
The next question is, that motion S1M-3641, in the name of Bill Aitken, on drugs courts, as amended, be agreed to. Are we agreed?
No.
There will be a division.
Party Summary
Votes by party, red entries are votes against the majority for that party.
| Party | Majority (Aye) | Minority (No) | Abstentions | Turnout |
| Con | 1 | 15 | 0 | 84.2% |
| Green | 0 | 0 | 1 | 100.0% |
| Independent | 1 | 0 | 1 | 66.7% |
| Lab | 49 | 0 | 0 | 89.1% |
| LDem | 11 | 0 | 0 | 68.8% |
| SNP | 0 | 0 | 27 | 81.8% |
| SSP | 0 | 0 | 1 | 100.0% |
| Total: | 62 | 15 | 30 | 83.6% |
All MPs Eligible to Vote - sorted by party
Includes MPs who were absent (or abstained) from this vote.
Sort by: Name | Constituency | Party | Vote