[S2M-61] Decision Time — 28 May 2003 at 17:00
This looks like the vote on S2M-61
The description in the bulletin on 2003-05-27 is:
*S2M-61 Malcolm Chisholm: The Food Protection (Emergency Prohibitions) (Amnesic Shellfish Poisoning) (West Coast) (Scotland) Order 2003 and the Food Protection (Emergency Prohibitions) (Amnesic Shellfish Poisoning) (West Coast) (No.2) (Scotland) Order 2003—That the Parliament agrees that the Food Protection (Emergency Prohibitions) (Amnesic Shellfish Poisoning) (West Coast) (Scotland) Order 2003 (SSI 2003/244) and the Food Protection (Emergency Prohibitions) (Amnesic Shellfish Poisoning) (West Coast) (No.2) (Scotland) Order 2003 (SSI 2003/245) be approved. Supported by: Mr Tom McCabe*
You can search for this motion (S2M-61) on TheyWorkForYou
Text Introducing Division:
There is one question to be put as a result of today's business. The question is, that motion S2M-61, in the name of Malcolm Chisholm, on the Food Protection (Emergency Prohibitions) (Amnesic Shellfish Poisoning) (West Coast) (Scotland) Order 2003 and the Food Protection (Emergency Prohibitions) (Amnesic Shellfish Poisoning) (West Coast) (No 2) (Scotland) Order 2003 be agreed to. Are we agreed?
No.
There will be a division.
Party Summary
Votes by party, red entries are votes against the majority for that party.
Party | Majority (Aye) | Minority (No) | Abstentions | Turnout |
Con | 0 | 13 | 0 | 72.2% |
Green | 0 | 0 | 1 | 14.3% |
Independent | 1 | 0 | 0 | 33.3% |
Lab | 48 | 0 | 0 | 96.0% |
LDem | 11 | 0 | 0 | 64.7% |
SNP | 17 | 1 | 0 | 69.2% |
SSCUP | 1 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% |
Total: | 78 | 14 | 1 | 76.2% |
All MPs Eligible to Vote - sorted by party
Includes MPs who were absent (or abstained) from this vote.
Sort by: Name | Constituency | Party | Vote