[S2M-161.4 (Amendment)] Decision Time — 19 Jun 2003 at 16:58
This looks like the vote on S2M-161.4
The description in the bulletin on 2003-06-19 is:
*S2M-161.4 Mr Tom McCabe: Care Homes for the Elderly-As an amendment to motion (S2M-161) in the name of Mr David Davidson, leave out from first "notes" to end and insert "acknowledges the problems faced by some Church of Scotland care homes but recognises that the Scottish Executive has met in full the recommendations of the National Review Group on care home fees which resulted in an extra investment of over £130 million in the care home sector since July 2001; welcomes the work currently being undertaken by COSLA and the care home sector in establishing a framework for assessing the cost of providing care for older people from 2005-06, and notes the continuing commitment of the Executive to shift the balance of care from institutional settings to providing care at home and its setting up of the national care standards which provide a quality framework." Supported by: Malcolm Chisholm*
You can search for this motion (S2M-161.4) on TheyWorkForYou
Text Introducing Division:
The next question is, that amendment S2M-161.4, in the name of Tom McCabe, which seeks to amend motion S2M-161, in the name of David Davidson, on care homes for the elderly, be agreed to. Are we agreed?
No.
There will be a division.
Party Summary
Votes by party, red entries are votes against the majority for that party.
| Party | Majority (Aye) | Minority (No) | Abstentions | Turnout |
| Con | 0 | 15 | 0 | 83.3% |
| Green | 0 | 6 | 0 | 85.7% |
| Independent | 1 | 1 | 0 | 66.7% |
| Lab | 46 | 0 | 0 | 92.0% |
| LDem | 15 | 0 | 0 | 88.2% |
| SNP | 0 | 23 | 0 | 88.5% |
| SSCUP | 1 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% |
| SSP | 0 | 3 | 0 | 50.0% |
| Total: | 63 | 48 | 0 | 86.7% |
All MPs Eligible to Vote - sorted by constituency
Includes MPs who were absent (or abstained) from this vote.
Sort by: Name | Constituency | Party | Vote