[S2M-191.2 (Amendment)] Decision Time — 25 Jun 2003 at 17:05
This looks like the vote on S2M-191.2
The description in the bulletin on 2003-06-25 is:
*S2M-191.2 Miss Annabel Goldie: Modernising Justice—As an amendment to motion (S2M-191) in the name of Cathy Jamieson, leave out from "supporting" to end and insert "and, while welcoming proposals to make more efficient the processing and disposal of criminal cases, expresses concern at the proposed extension to the 110 day rule, the resources implication for sheriff courts of handling an increased workload and the continuing inadequacy of resources available to the police and the Crown Office and Procurator Fiscal Service."
You can search for this motion (S2M-191.2) on TheyWorkForYou
Text Introducing Division:
The next question is, that amendment S2M-191.2, in the name of Annabel Goldie, which seeks to amend motion S2M-191, in the name of Cathy Jamieson, on modernising justice, be agreed to. Are we agreed?
No.
There will be a division.
Party Summary
Votes by party, red entries are votes against the majority for that party.
| Party | Majority (No) | Minority (Aye) | Abstentions | Turnout |
| Con | 0 | 17 | 0 | 94.4% |
| Green | 0 | 0 | 1 | 14.3% |
| Independent | 2 | 1 | 0 | 100.0% |
| Lab | 48 | 1 | 0 | 98.0% |
| LDem | 15 | 0 | 0 | 88.2% |
| SNP | 1 | 24 | 0 | 96.2% |
| SSCUP | 1 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% |
| SSP | 0 | 4 | 0 | 66.7% |
| Total: | 67 | 47 | 1 | 89.8% |
All MPs Eligible to Vote - sorted by party
Includes MPs who were absent (or abstained) from this vote.
Sort by: Name | Constituency | Party | Vote