[S2M-849.3 (Amendment)] Decision Time — 5 Feb 2004 at 17:02
This looks like the vote on S2M-849.3
The description in the bulletin on 2004-02-05 is:
*S2M-849.3 Hugh Henry: Police Accountability-As an amendment to motion (S2M-849) in the name of David McLetchie, leave out from "notes" to end and insert "endorses the Scottish Executive's commitment to work for a safer Scotland by reducing crime and re-offending; welcomes its commitment to enhance community accountability for policing through local police boards; endorses its promotion of responsiveness to local communities through police boards' duty to secure Best Value and to report to the public on performance, and welcomes its policy of Community Planning which is enabling police forces to improve the delivery of services to local communities through more effective collaboration with other public bodies." Supported by: Cathy Jamieson*
You can search for this motion (S2M-849.3) on TheyWorkForYou
Text Introducing Division:
The first question is, that amendment S2M-849.3, in the name of Hugh Henry, which seeks to amend motion S2M-849, in the name of David McLetchie, on police accountability, be agreed to. Are we agreed?
No.
There will be a division.
Party Summary
Votes by party, red entries are votes against the majority for that party.
| Party | Majority (Aye) | Minority (No) | Abstentions | Turnout |
| Con | 0 | 17 | 0 | 94.4% |
| Green | 0 | 0 | 7 | 100.0% |
| Independent | 2 | 0 | 0 | 66.7% |
| Lab | 46 | 0 | 0 | 92.0% |
| LDem | 16 | 0 | 0 | 94.1% |
| SNP | 0 | 25 | 0 | 96.2% |
| SSP | 0 | 5 | 0 | 83.3% |
| Total: | 64 | 47 | 7 | 92.9% |
All MPs Eligible to Vote - sorted by constituency
Includes MPs who were absent (or abstained) from this vote.
Sort by: Name | Constituency | Party | Vote