[S2M-532.2 (Amendment)] Decision Time — 10 Mar 2004 at 17:06
This looks like the vote on S2M-532.2
The description in the bulletin on 2004-03-10 is:
*S2M-532.2 Colin Fox: Antisocial Behaviour etc. (Scotland) Bill—As an amendment to motion (S2M-532) in the name of Ms Margaret Curran, leave out from "agrees" to end and insert "does not agree to the general principles of the Antisocial Behaviour etc. (Scotland) Bill because it believes that the most effective way to address antisocial behaviour is through greater investment in a wide range of community support services, does not believe that the punitive measures contained in the Bill will address this issue, believes that a fully-resourced Children’s Hearing system represents the best way of dealing with young offenders; does not believe that extending the use of Antisocial Behaviour Orders to under-16s is appropriate, and considers that, rather than creating extra legal powers such as dispersal, the police should be provided with extra resources."
You can search for this motion (S2M-532.2) on TheyWorkForYou
Text Introducing Division:
The second question is, that amendment S2M-532.2, in the name of Colin Fox, which seeks to amend motion S2M-532, in the name of Ms Margaret Curran, on the general principles of the Antisocial Behaviour etc (Scotland) Bill, be agreed to. Are we agreed?
No.
There will be a division.
Party Summary
Votes by party, red entries are votes against the majority for that party.
| Party | Majority (No) | Minority (Aye) | Abstentions | Turnout |
| Con | 17 | 0 | 0 | 94.4% |
| Green | 0 | 7 | 0 | 100.0% |
| Independent | 0 | 0 | 1 | 33.3% |
| Lab | 48 | 0 | 0 | 96.0% |
| LDem | 15 | 0 | 0 | 88.2% |
| SNP | 21 | 0 | 1 | 84.6% |
| SSCUP | 0 | 0 | 1 | 100.0% |
| SSP | 0 | 6 | 0 | 100.0% |
| Total: | 101 | 13 | 3 | 91.4% |
All MPs Eligible to Vote - sorted by name
Includes MPs who were absent (or abstained) from this vote.
Sort by: Name | Constituency | Party | Vote