[S2M-1033.2 (Amendment)] Decision Time — 11 Mar 2004 at 17:00
This looks like the vote on S2M-1033.2
The description in the bulletin on 2004-03-11 is:
*S2M-1033.2 Roseanna Cunningham: The Historic Environment, A Valuable Resource for Scotland—As an amendment to motion (S2M-1033) in the name of Mr Frank McAveety, insert at end "; regrets that, notwithstanding the work done by individuals and organisations, there remain serious concerns about (a) a lack of both resources and information and (b) the failure to sufficiently protect, conserve, interpret and promote Scotland’s historic environment and endorses the call for a review of the historic environment backed up by a regular audit to measure progress."
You can search for this motion (S2M-1033.2) on TheyWorkForYou
Text Introducing Division:
The next question is, that amendment S2M-1033.2, in the name of Roseanna Cunningham, which seeks to amend motion S2M-1033, in the name of Frank McAveety, on the historic environment-a valuable resource for Scotland, be agreed to. Are we agreed?
No.
There will be a division.
Party Summary
Votes by party, red entries are votes against the majority for that party.
Party | Majority (No) | Minority (Aye) | Abstentions | Turnout |
Con | 0 | 16 | 0 | 88.9% |
Green | 0 | 7 | 0 | 100.0% |
Independent | 0 | 2 | 0 | 66.7% |
Lab | 47 | 0 | 0 | 94.0% |
LDem | 15 | 0 | 0 | 88.2% |
SNP | 0 | 22 | 0 | 84.6% |
SSCUP | 0 | 1 | 0 | 100.0% |
SSP | 0 | 6 | 0 | 100.0% |
Total: | 62 | 54 | 0 | 90.6% |
All MPs Eligible to Vote - sorted by constituency
Includes MPs who were absent (or abstained) from this vote.
Sort by: Name | Constituency | Party | Vote