[S2M-1089.4 (Amendment)] Decision Time — 25 Mar 2004 at 17:01
This looks like the vote on S2M-1089.4
The description in the bulletin on 2004-03-25 is:
*S2M-1089.4 Lewis Macdonald: Zero Waste-As an amendment to motion (S2M-1089) in the name of Shiona Baird, leave out from "notes" to end and insert "welcomes the recent increase in recycling and composting; notes paragraph 7.3.3 of the National Waste Plan 2003 which states that Zero Waste "provides a platform for challenging our current systems and radically reducing waste beyond even the best current levels of achievement" and the aim in the National Waste Plan to stop growth in the amount of municipal waste produced by 2010; further notes the work being carried out by the Waste and Resources Action Programme, Envirowise, the Scottish Environment Protection Agency and others to minimise business and household waste; recognises the Scottish Executive's commitment to increasing packaging recovery targets from 59% to 70% by 2008, and calls on the Executive to continue its work to prevent and minimise waste, to increase recycling and to divert waste from landfill." Supported by: Allan Wilson*
You can search for this motion (S2M-1089.4) on TheyWorkForYou
Text Introducing Division:
The first question is, that amendment S2M-1089.4, in the name of Lewis Macdonald, which seeks to amend motion S2M-1089, in the name of Shiona Baird, on zero waste, be agreed to. Are we agreed?
No.
There will be a division.
Party Summary
Votes by party, red entries are votes against the majority for that party.
| Party | Majority (Aye) | Minority (No) | Abstentions | Turnout |
| Con | 17 | 1 | 0 | 100.0% |
| Green | 0 | 7 | 0 | 100.0% |
| Independent | 0 | 2 | 0 | 66.7% |
| Lab | 46 | 0 | 0 | 92.0% |
| LDem | 16 | 0 | 0 | 94.1% |
| SNP | 0 | 25 | 0 | 96.2% |
| SSP | 0 | 5 | 0 | 83.3% |
| Total: | 79 | 40 | 0 | 93.7% |
All MPs Eligible to Vote - sorted by constituency
Includes MPs who were absent (or abstained) from this vote.
Sort by: Name | Constituency | Party | Vote