[S2M-1116.2 (Amendment)] Decision Time — 31 Mar 2004 at 17:08
This looks like the vote on S2M-1116.2
The description in the bulletin on 2004-03-31 is:
*S2M-1116.2 Mr Jim Wallace: The Effect of Strip Stamps on the Whisky Industry-As an amendment to motion (S2M-1116) in the name of Murdo Fraser, Leave out from ", thereby adversely" to end and insert "; and therefore calls on HM Treasury to engage in further discussion with the industry on the impact of these measures with a view to reaching a satisfactory outcome which deals with tax fraud and would lead to the decision being reversed, failing which to ensure that a comprehensive package of compensation measures is put in place to minimise the impact on the industry. Supported by: Lewis Macdonald*
You can search for this motion (S2M-1116.2) on TheyWorkForYou
Text Introducing Division:
There are 11 questions to be put as a result of today's business. The first question is, that amendment S2M-1116.2, in the name of Jim Wallace, which seeks to amend motion S2M-1116, in the name of Murdo Fraser, on the effect of strip stamps on the whisky industry be agreed to. Are we agreed?
No.
There will be a division.
Party Summary
Votes by party, red entries are votes against the majority for that party.
| Party | Majority (Aye) | Minority (No) | Abstentions | Turnout |
| Con | 18 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% |
| Green | 6 | 0 | 0 | 85.7% |
| Independent | 2 | 0 | 1 | 100.0% |
| Lab | 46 | 0 | 0 | 92.0% |
| LDem | 16 | 0 | 0 | 94.1% |
| SNP | 23 | 0 | 0 | 88.5% |
| SSCUP | 1 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% |
| SSP | 0 | 4 | 0 | 66.7% |
| Total: | 112 | 4 | 1 | 91.4% |
All MPs Eligible to Vote - sorted by vote
Includes MPs who were absent (or abstained) from this vote.
Sort by: Name | Constituency | Party | Vote