[S2M-1039.1 (Amendment)] Decision Time — 1 Apr 2004 at 17:33
This looks like the vote on S2M-1039.1
The description in the bulletin on 2004-03-31 is:
*S2M-1039.1 Lord James Douglas-Hamilton: Education (Additional Support for Learning) (Scotland) Bill-As an amendment to motion (S2M-1039) in the name of Peter Peacock, insert at end "but, in so doing, expresses concern that the Scottish Executive did not act fully upon the recommendations of the Education Committee's 2nd Report 2004 (Session 2), Stage 1 Report on Education (Additional Support for Learning) (Scotland) Bill, and is concerned that a significant number of parents who formerly had records of needs for their child will no longer have comparable legal rights to those parents whose children will qualify for a Co-ordinated Support Plan." Supported by: Fiona Hyslop*, Mr Adam Ingram*, Robin Harper*
The description in the bulletin on 2004-04-01 is:
S2M-1039.1 Education (Additional Support for Learning) (Scotland) Bill (lodged on 30 March 2004) John Swinburne*
Text Introducing Division:
There are five questions to be put as a result of today's business. The first question is, that amendment S2M-1039.1, in the name of Lord James Douglas-Hamilton, which seeks to amend motion S2M-1039, in the name of Peter Peacock, that the Education (Additional Support for Learning) (Scotland) Bill be passed, be agreed to. Are we agreed?
There will be a division.
Votes by party, red entries are votes against the majority for that party.
|Party||Majority (No)||Minority (Aye)||Abstentions||Turnout|
Includes MPs who were absent (or abstained) from this vote.