[S2M-1100] Decision Time — 28 Apr 2004 at 17:01
This looks like the vote on S2M-1100
The description in the bulletin on 2004-03-26 is:
*S2M-1100 Cathy Jamieson: Criminal Procedure (Amendment) (Scotland) Bill-That the Parliament agrees that the Criminal Procedure (Amendment) (Scotland) Bill be passed. Supported by: Hugh Henry*
The description in the bulletin on 2004-03-29 is:
S2M-1100 Cathy Jamieson: Criminal Procedure (Amendment) (Scotland) Bill-That the Parliament agrees that the Criminal Procedure (Amendment) (Scotland) Bill be passed. Supported by: Hugh Henry
The description in the bulletin on 2004-04-26 is:
S2M-1100 Cathy Jamieson: Criminal Procedure (Amendment) (Scotland) Bill-That the Parliament agrees that the Criminal Procedure (Amendment) (Scotland) Bill be passed. Supported by: Hugh Henry
You can search for this motion (S2M-1100) on TheyWorkForYou
Text Introducing Division:
There are five questions to be put as a result of today's business. The first question is, that motion S2M-1100, in the name of Cathy Jamieson, that the Criminal Procedure (Amendment) Scotland Bill be passed, be agreed to. Are we agreed?
No.
There will be a division.
Party Summary
Votes by party, red entries are votes against the majority for that party.
| Party | Majority (Aye) | Minority (No) | Abstentions | Turnout |
| Con | 13 | 0 | 0 | 72.2% |
| Green | 7 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% |
| Independent | 1 | 0 | 0 | 33.3% |
| Lab | 49 | 0 | 0 | 98.0% |
| LDem | 17 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% |
| SNP | 24 | 0 | 0 | 92.3% |
| SSCUP | 1 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% |
| SSP | 0 | 0 | 5 | 83.3% |
| Total: | 112 | 0 | 5 | 91.4% |
All MPs Eligible to Vote - sorted by party
Includes MPs who were absent (or abstained) from this vote.
Sort by: Name | Constituency | Party | Vote