[S2M-1695.2 (Amendment)] Decision Time — 16 Sep 2004 at 16:48
This looks like the vote on S2M-1695.2
The description in the bulletin on 2004-09-16 is:
*S2M-1695.2 Jim Mather: Growing Scotland’s Economy - Building on Progress—As an amendment to motion (S2M-1695) in the name of Mr Jim Wallace, leave out from "; notes" to end and insert "in the belief that the case has now been made and popularly acclaimed at home and internationally-proven in recent competitiveness indices for more powers for the Parliament, which are needed in order to reverse Scotland’s historically low rate of economic growth and generate both the wealth required to provide world-class public services and infrastructure and the high quality employment opportunities needed to retain and develop fresh talent in Scotland."
You can search for this motion (S2M-1695.2) on TheyWorkForYou
Text Introducing Division:
The first question is, that amendment S2M-1695.2, in the name of Jim Mather, which seeks to amend motion S2M-1695, in the name of Jim Wallace, on growing Scotland's economy and building on progress, be agreed to. Are we agreed?
No.
There will be a division.
Party Summary
Votes by party, red entries are votes against the majority for that party.
| Party | Majority (No) | Minority (Aye) | Abstentions | Turnout |
| Con | 14 | 0 | 0 | 77.8% |
| Green | 6 | 0 | 0 | 85.7% |
| Independent | 0 | 2 | 1 | 75.0% |
| Lab | 45 | 0 | 0 | 90.0% |
| LDem | 17 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% |
| SNP | 0 | 17 | 0 | 68.0% |
| SSCUP | 0 | 1 | 0 | 100.0% |
| SSP | 0 | 0 | 5 | 83.3% |
| Total: | 82 | 20 | 6 | 84.4% |
All MPs Eligible to Vote - sorted by constituency
Includes MPs who were absent (or abstained) from this vote.
Sort by: Name | Constituency | Party | Vote