[S2M-2165.4 (Amendment)] Decision Time — 16 Dec 2004 at 17:08
This looks like the vote on S2M-2165.4
The description in the bulletin on 2004-12-16 is:
*S2M-2165.4 Mr John Home Robertson: Proposed Defence Reviews from a Scottish Perspective—As an amendment to motion (S2M-2165) in the name of Murdo Fraser, leave out from first "notes" to end and insert "acknowledges the importance of Scotland’s substantial contribution to the armed forces of the United Kingdom; notes the social and economic value of the military to communities throughout Scotland; believes that Scotland is rightly proud of the historic and current contribution of Scottish service personnel to the defence of the United Kingdom and to peacekeeping operations worldwide; accepts the need for the military to drive decisions about the structure of efficient armed forces for the modern world, and believes that the traditions, community links and identities of Scotland’s infantry battalions should be maintained in the armed forces of the United Kingdom." Supported by: Scott Barrie*
You can search for this motion (S2M-2165.4) on TheyWorkForYou
Text Introducing Division:
The first question is, that amendment S2M-2165.4, in the name of John Home Robertson, which seeks to amend motion S2M-2165, in the name of Murdo Fraser, on proposed defence reviews from a Scottish perspective, be agreed to. Are we agreed?
No.
There will be a division.
Party Summary
Votes by party, red entries are votes against the majority for that party.
| Party | Majority (No) | Minority (Aye) | Abstentions | Turnout |
| Con | 18 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% |
| Green | 0 | 0 | 7 | 100.0% |
| Independent | 0 | 1 | 4 | 100.0% |
| Lab | 1 | 48 | 0 | 100.0% |
| LDem | 17 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% |
| SNP | 25 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% |
| SSCUP | 0 | 1 | 0 | 100.0% |
| SSP | 5 | 0 | 0 | 83.3% |
| Total: | 66 | 50 | 11 | 99.2% |
All MPs Eligible to Vote - sorted by constituency
Includes MPs who were absent (or abstained) from this vote.
Sort by: Name | Constituency | Party | Vote