[S2M-2506.4 (Amendment)] Decision Time — 3 Mar 2005 at 16:40
This looks like the vote on S2M-2506.4
The description in the bulletin on 2005-03-03 is:
*S2M-2506.4 Mr Tom McCabe: The Right to Protest at Gleneagles—As an amendment to motion (S2M-2506) in the name of Rosie Kane, insert at end "further recognises that protestors have responsibilities to uphold the law and deplores calls by an unrepresentative minority to use the occasion to engage in unlawful and violent activity; pledges full endorsement of the work of the Scottish Police Service to ensure public safety and order and facilitate peaceful protest; welcomes the tremendous opportunity presented by the G8 to show to a watching world everything that is good about Scotland and Scotland’s people, and acknowledges that the summit is also an opportunity to encourage debate, raise awareness and challenge people within Scotland about the key issues of poverty in Africa and climate change." Supported by: Tavish Scott* Motions and amendments which have attracted additional support
You can search for this motion (S2M-2506.4) on TheyWorkForYou
Text Introducing Division:
The next question is, that amendment S2M-2506.4, in the name of Mr Tom McCabe, which seeks to amend motion S2M-2506, in the name of Rosie Kane, on the right to protest at Gleneagles, be agreed to. Are we agreed?
No.
There will be a division.
Party Summary
Votes by party, red entries are votes against the majority for that party.
| Party | Majority (Aye) | Minority (No) | Abstentions | Turnout |
| Con | 16 | 0 | 0 | 88.9% |
| Green | 0 | 0 | 6 | 85.7% |
| Independent | 2 | 0 | 0 | 40.0% |
| Lab | 45 | 0 | 0 | 91.8% |
| LDem | 16 | 0 | 0 | 94.1% |
| SNP | 23 | 0 | 0 | 92.0% |
| SSCUP | 1 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% |
| SSP | 0 | 5 | 0 | 83.3% |
| Total: | 103 | 5 | 6 | 89.1% |
All MPs Eligible to Vote - sorted by constituency
Includes MPs who were absent (or abstained) from this vote.
Sort by: Name | Constituency | Party | Vote